- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:07:18 +0200
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Cf. RDF Working Group Charter, Section 3: """ 3. Out of Scope [...] Removing current restrictions in the RDF model (e.g., literals not allowed as subjects, or blank nodes as predicates) """ http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#outofscope While we are proposing out of scope features, I suggest the following: <sarcasm> Proposal: subjects in RDF graphs can be literals. Explanation: this change is being made to improve cohesion in the RDF data model and to align with SPARQL, with OWL 2 RL rules, RIF, with practices in reasoners. Note: RDF Concepts will include warnings that use of literals for subjects will cause interoperability problems for a period of time, and that this extension is to be used only when necessary. </sarcasm> AZ. Le 25/06/2013 17:18, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit : > There is an agenda on the web page but I don't see an email message. > > > I would like to put discussion (and resolution) of blank nodes as > predicates onto the agenda. > > Proposal: Predicates in RDF graphs can be blank nodes. > Explanation: This change is being made to improve cohesion in the RDF > data model and to align with JSON-LD. > Note: RDF Concepts will include warnings that use of blank nodes for > predicates and for graph names will cause interoperability problems > for a period of time, and that these extensions are to be used only > when necessary. > > > peter > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 16:07:49 UTC