Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June?

Yes, Antoine is right regardless of the state of JSON-LD.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:07, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote:

> Cf. RDF Working Group Charter, Section 3:
> 
> """
> 3. Out of Scope
> 
> [...]
> Removing current restrictions in the RDF model (e.g., literals not allowed as subjects, or blank nodes as predicates)
> """
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#outofscope
> 
> 
> While we are proposing out of scope features, I suggest the following:
> 
> <sarcasm>
> Proposal: subjects in RDF graphs can be literals.
> Explanation: this change is being made to improve cohesion in the RDF data model and to align with SPARQL, with OWL 2 RL rules, RIF, with practices in reasoners.
> Note:  RDF Concepts will include warnings that use of literals for subjects will cause interoperability problems for a period of time, and that this extension is to be used only when necessary.
> </sarcasm>
> 
> 
> AZ.
> 
> Le 25/06/2013 17:18, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit :
>> There is an agenda on the web page but I don't see an email message.
>> 
>> 
>> I would like to put discussion (and resolution) of blank nodes as
>> predicates onto the agenda.
>> 
>> Proposal:   Predicates in RDF graphs can be blank nodes.
>> Explanation:  This change is being made to improve cohesion in the RDF
>> data model and to align with JSON-LD.
>> Note:  RDF Concepts will include warnings that use of blank nodes for
>> predicates and for graph names will cause interoperability problems
>> for a period of time, and that these extensions are to be used only
>> when necessary.
>> 
>> 
>> peter
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Antoine Zimmermann
> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
> 158 cours Fauriel
> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
> France
> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
>