- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:57:07 -0500
- To: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Peter & Antoine: New version now has the required edits to implement this change. It was surprisingly easy to do. I deleted the lemma about merging being valid, since it can now not be stated without awkwardness. If y'all want it back in, I can restore it. Pat On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > >> At first sight, I find this solution to be a good compromise. > > Then I wholeheartedly agree. This will enable us to make progress. > > Good job, Peter :-) > > Do you want me to do the necessary edits? > > Pat > >> >> Since I know the content of the documents pretty well, I am pretty sure that it does not require substantial changes. >> >> Thank you to have taken my concerns in consideration. >> >> >> AZ >> >> Le 19/06/2013 18:26, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit : >>> One way to move forward on the union vs merge front is to not define >>> entailment for sets of RDF graphs. If one has a set of RDF graphs, >>> then one has to first either union or merge them. >>> >>> There would need to be changes in several places in RDF Semantics. I >>> don't think that these changes would be substantive (but they might be >>> substantial). No changes should be needed in any other document, >>> which shows just how much importance this issue has. (Yes, I've >>> checked RDF Concepts, which is the only place where there might have >>> been required changes.) >>> >>> I'm willing to go through and document the changes required, and >>> determine whether there is any substantive change required, *provided >>> that the interested parties agree that this change is an acceptable >>> solution to the issue*. >>> >>> >>> I hereby state that I agree that removing entailment for sets of RDF >>> graphs is an acceptable solution to the issue. >>> >>> >>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>> Nuance Communications >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Antoine Zimmermann >> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol >> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne >> 158 cours Fauriel >> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 >> France >> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 >> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 >> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/ >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 06:57:40 UTC