- From: Makoto Ueki <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:40:54 +0900
- To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Hi Loretta, Here are my comments for the responses from WCAG WG. > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0031.html This is not my comment, right? :-) > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0032.html OK. > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0033.html WCAG WG should add the response to the Understanding document: --- Symbols could apply to 'anything that represents something else' See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol . It is not limited to graphic symbols for people with developmental disorders and speech comprehension difficulties. --- Wihout this, the readers could misunderstand that "symbols" means "graphic symbols for people with developmental disorders and speech comprehension difficulties. Actually JIS working group misunderstood it and was confused. > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0034.html OK. This explanation should be included in the Understanding document. --- This means "indicating that something will happen or has already happened". For example, using color to indicate that a link will open in a new window or that a database entry been updated successfully. "Prompting a response" refers to a use of color that would indicate that the user should do something. For example, a Web page could use highlighting on form fields to indicate that a required field had been left blank. --- Non-English speaking readers could misunderstand what it means. > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0035.html OK. > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0036.html It is still hard to understand what "glyph" includes. Visual examples of "glyph" would help the readers to understand it, especially for non-English speaking readers. > [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0037.html Please see: http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/typespacing/a/zxfleading_img.htm The blue shows "line spacing" or "leading". Am I correct? > [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0038.html In the case of using CSS, what the author have to do is to set "line-height:150%". Am I correct? > [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0039.html OK. > [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0040.html OK. "Timing" has been a part of Japanese language and doesn't mean "time limit". Now we can understand what this note means. > [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0041.html OK. > [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0042.html OK. It became understandable and translatable. > [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0043.html OK. > [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0044.html OK. > [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0045.html Let me confirm. Conformance claim at Level AA is encouraged to include the list of success criteria at Level AAA the site already met. Am I correct? > [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0046.html OK. > [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0047.html OK. Are all of the words in glossary used in the same meaning? If so, no problem. We thought that the word "process" in SC 2.2.2 Note 3 was different from the "process" in other sections, but we were not sure and it was very confusing for us to translate the documents. For translation, all words in glossary used in the document should link to the definition in glossary. It allows us to translate much easier. > [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0004.html OK. > [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0005.html OK. > [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0006.html OK. > [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0007.html OK. > [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0008.html OK. > [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0010.html OK. > [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0011.html OK. > [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0012.html OK. > [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0032.html OK. JIS working group just started to find the equivalent font size for the Japanese characters. This Note 5 is fine with JIS working group. We'll find and add the size to the new version of JIS next year. > [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0037.html OK. > [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0042.html OK. The following information should be added to the Understanding document. Without this, nobody can find the equivalent font size for Chinese, Korean, or any other languages than the alphabetical language like English. --- The American Printing House for the Blind publishes "The American Printing House for the Blind Guidelines for Large Printing" <http://www.aph.org/edresearch/lpguide.htm> This is where the 18 point minimum comes from. The Library of Congress publishes "National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (NLS), The Library of Congress Guidelines for Large Print" <http://www.loc.gov/nls/reference/circulars/largeprint.html>. This is where the 14 point minimum comes from. --- That's all. Thanks. - Makoto 2008/10/30 Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>: > Hi, Makoto and JIS, > > The WCAG Working Group responded to your postings to the > public comments list, listed below, on 22 Aug, 29 Aug, 3 Oct, 6 Oct, > and 23 Oct 2008. We wanted to confirm that you are satisfied with our > resolution. > > Could you let us know by this Friday, 31 October? We apologize > for the short notice. Thanks again for the interest that you have > taken in WCAG 2.0. > > Regards, > > Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair > Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair > Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact > > On behalf of the WCAG Working Group > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0031.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0032.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0033.html > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0034.html > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0035.html > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0036.html > [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0037.html > [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0038.html > [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0039.html > [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0040.html > [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0041.html > [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0042.html > [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0043.html > [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0044.html > [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0045.html > [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0046.html > [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Aug/0047.html > [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0004.html > [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0005.html > [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0006.html > [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0007.html > [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0008.html > [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0010.html > [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0011.html > [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0012.html > [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0032.html > [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0037.html > [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2008Oct/0042.html >
Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 07:42:12 UTC