1.4.5 wording can use some improvement
20 hour exception is too long for secure sessions dealing with identification and financial information and services
200% seems too ambitious
5 is too much and miss of exceptions
About unique link names
Absence of a success criterion that covers the absence of support for scripting or programmatic objects
Absence of mention of XHTML whenever HTML is used for referring to Web page markup
Absence of success criterion for deprecated and obsolete features
Absence of success criterion for markup/properties that prevent configuring pages/interfaces to meet accessibility needs
accessibility of social networking site content
accessibility supported definition and concept is confusing
achieving all or one ?
Additional failure technique needed
Additional requirement for contrast controls
alternative to text with external text ?
block sizing with absolute unit and text sizing with relative unit
Bypass Blocks confusing
Change SC level for flashing content
Changing SC for re-authentication after time limit expiration
color and pattern for background-image too ?
Components do not have \"sensory\" characteristics but just attributes or characteristics.
Concern about providing an alt version of readable content
Conformance Level wrong
contrast control available on or from the page
Cross reference for SC of different conformance level
Currently not addressed: Background images disappear with user-specific colors
double negative in the essential exception
Drafting of SC does not convey intent. Not clear.
EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0
Essential Exception
Example \"A help dialog ...\"
Geberal Advice is listed as a failure
How to decide wether it is \"large scale text\" or not
HTML Version of Understanding WCAG with semantic classes and IDs
Information on current location conformance level change
Is it proven that the new algorithm for calculating brightness is superior to the old one?
labels and headings definition not sufficient
lists for accessibility supported technologies
Making links visually distinct
meaning of accessibility supported unclear
meaningful and logical sequence
Media exemption to 1.1.1
Minimum contrast needed for default layout in case 1.4.3 is met via a contrast control
missing situation
Missing Success Criteria - Acronyms
paragraph spacing is larger than line spacing
Potential consequences of success criterion 3.2.5 are too severe for \"AAA\"
problem with example of change of context
Provide a quick reference for web designer
provide greater support for people with cognitive, language or reading difficulties
Provide no keyboard trap information in context
Reference to \"users with disabilities\" in appropriate
Refering to \"users\" vs. \"users with disabilities\"
SC 1.4.5 unclear
scaling of line-height and containers-heights
Space missing in \"visuallycustomized\" of the \"Customizable\" list item.
Step backwards from WCAG 1.0?
technical terms definition and example
Technique G142 Insufficient
Test
The subject here does not affect an content author.
Unclear wording of Sufficient Technique H73
Unnecessary extra Principle 4
Use of \"disability\" instead of \"impairment\".
very similar in color to the body text condition
WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission
When is a change of content a change of context
Why do contrast requirements not apply to lines in diagrams and such?
Why the exception for proper names and technical terms?
Word \"Essential\" is confusing
Word \"limited\" is confusing
Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 21:50:14 UTC