xml-encryption@w3.org from August 2001 by thread

a different comment on 5.5 - shouldn't it be mentioned in 3.4 als o? Amir Herzberg (Thursday, 30 August)

On 5.5 key agreement Amir Herzberg (Thursday, 30 August)

Completed Action Item: Nonce text. Joseph Reagle (Monday, 27 August)

Comment Dournaee, Blake (Thursday, 23 August)

RE: Updated Section 4.1 Blair Dillaway (Thursday, 23 August)

octet-based processing model merlin (Thursday, 23 August)

Slides Dournaee, Blake (Wednesday, 22 August)

Updated Section 4. Blair Dillaway (Tuesday, 21 August)

Minutes of 010820-teleconf Joseph Reagle (Monday, 20 August)

xmlenc Call 13:00 EST August 20 2001 Joseph Reagle (Thursday, 16 August)

Security Concerns (Was: Surreptitious Forwarding) Joseph Reagle (Thursday, 16 August)

Encryption metadata Dan Lanz (Monday, 13 August)

Interruptions of Service Joseph Reagle (Thursday, 9 August)

CipherValue should be base64Binary not ds:CryptoBinary Brian LaMacchia (Thursday, 9 August)

Section 4.1 and 4.2 proposal Blair Dillaway (Wednesday, 8 August)

Possible weakness with signatures w/ encryption key info Amir Herzberg (Monday, 6 August)

signatures w/ encryption key info merlin (Monday, 6 August)

Newer Nonce Proposal Donald Eastlake (Thursday, 2 August)

Algorithms Section update based on 20 July 2001 F2F Donald Eastlake (Thursday, 2 August)

Re: Questions on processing rules Takeshi Imamura (Thursday, 2 August)

RE: "Replace and encrypt will be Recommended (optional)." Takeshi Imamura (Thursday, 2 August)

FW: Fwd: Surreptitious Forwarding Plambeck, Thane (Wednesday, 1 August)

Re: Questions Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Wednesday, 1 August)

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2001 20:42:42 UTC