- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:39:25 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: "Blair Dillaway" <blaird@microsoft.com>, "XML Encryption WG" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
--8<-- 4.1 Encryption ... 5. EncryptedData Processing 1. ... implementations MUST be able to return the UTF-8 encoding of the EncryptedData element to the application ... 2. ... then the UTF-8 encoded EncryptedData element is always returned to the application ... -->8-- Why must we return the UTF-8 encoding of this element? This precludes returning, for example, a DOM structure. I would remove "the UTF-8 encoding of" and "UTF-8 encoded", so toolkits can operate as they desire. I don't understand why crypt and replace - a mere implementation detail, and nothing to do with interoperability - should be REQUIRED. If I implement element encryption from, for example, a SAX source, then I cannot formally replace, and so I cannot be compliant with this spec. I can provide the required data for the application to replace (e.g., a stream of SAX events) but does that actually comply with replacement? Merlin r/reagle@w3.org/2001.08.22/17:28:07 >Thanks Blair, it's now clear it was under-specified before! <smile/> > >I've had a go as well. I made a bunch of tweaks but I think most are for the >best. (If I missed something, please push back.) Some of the substantive >tweaks/questions I have are: > >1. On the replace, do we need to force the encoding of EncryptedData during >encryption? (Probably so....) >2. Also, I thought we agreed that the encrypt and replace was REQUIRED to >implement but optional to use? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 07:40:14 UTC