- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:15:48 -0400
- To: "Blair Dillaway" <blaird@microsoft.com>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
On Monday 27 August 2001 17:54, Blair Dillaway wrote: > I clearly misunderstood your concern (which is a good thing). There was > a discussion of the basic issue you raise on-going at the time you sent > your initial mail. See: So I'm not sure of the resolution of this thread. I've taken a stab at <del>UTF-encoded</del> in a few places in the Encryption section (4.1.5) that I think isn't required. Merlin, do you think any other diffs are necessary? I haven't removed it from Decryption (4.2.4). Blair, with respect to the mandatoriness of replace-and-encrypt, is your view that it should be RECOMMENDED with respect to *implementation*? I thought we agreed mandatory to implement would be a good thing since it will likely be a common operation and users of xenc implementations can have uniform expectations about its presence. Also, a question. In 4.2.2, what is meant by KeyInfo containing "key attributes." Do we mean children of KeyInfo?
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 16:17:00 UTC