W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Questions

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 15:06:43 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010801150604.024d11e0@localhost>
To: "Chng Bee Tiong" <zmzmz@singnet.com.sg>
Cc: "XML Encryption WG" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 18:07 7/31/2001, Chng Bee Tiong wrote:
>4. Referring to 2.1.5, why MUST encrypt <<whole>> EncryptedData and 
>EncryptedKey and not allowed for parts?

This was a feature inherited from the original proposal that I think was in 
there because there were few scenarios where this was a requirement and it 
potentially made things more complex.


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2001 15:06:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:04 UTC