- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:30:27 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
On Monday 27 August 2001 16:47, Rich Salz wrote: > Hmm, the SOAP folks split up things into two namespaces xsi (instance) > and xsd (datatype), and I always just assumed you had to do things that > way. I can see one advantage: I can import XENC without getting > complexType also defined. That might be compelling. I don't understand. We aren't using the xml schema instance namespace...?
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 16:30:29 UTC