W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Questions

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 09:16:34 -0400
Message-Id: <200108011316.JAA0000005879@torque.pothole.com>
To: "Chng Bee Tiong" <zmzmz@singnet.com.sg>
cc: "XML Encryption WG" <xml-encryption@w3.org>

From:  "Chng Bee Tiong" <zmzmz@singnet.com.sg>
Message-ID:  <003c01c11a0d$277f0f60$86d615a5@isc80281>
To:  "XML Encryption WG" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Date:  Wed, 1 Aug 2001 06:07:06 +0800

>On Revision 1.29:
>1. Why is AES-192 optional? aes-alg-00.txt states so, but I notice that =
>it remains an open issue in aes-alg-02.txt?

All parts related to AES in this spec should be considered subject to
revision when the dust settles around AES. When we say "optional" in
this document, it means optional to implement for the purposes of
claiming conformance to this recommendation. While we may be very
likely to follow other recommendations, we are not bound by them.

>Sorry if the above questions seem obvious... :-)

Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2001 09:18:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:04 UTC