- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:40:34 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
On Monday 27 August 2001 15:56, Rich Salz wrote: > > <attribute name="Nonce" type="base64Binary" use="optional"/> > > Hm. Taking a look at the schema definition at the start of Sec 3, > shouldn't the default namespace be the "-instance" verson? And > shouldn't there be something like > "xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" ? So that would make > base64Binary be "xsd:base64Binary" I suppose one could ... but why? I'm following conventions used in xmldsig that were used elsewhere and that haven't had any problems with yet [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv?docAddrs=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FEncryption%2F2001%2FDrafts%2Fxmlenc-core%2Fenc-example.xml+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FEncryption%2F2001%2FDrafts%2Fxmlenc-core%2Fxenc-schema.xsd&style=offline
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 16:40:35 UTC