W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Completed Action Item: Nonce text.

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:40:34 -0400
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
Cc: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010827204034.C696A873BF@policy.w3.org>
On Monday 27 August 2001 15:56, Rich Salz wrote:
> >      <attribute name="Nonce" type="base64Binary" use="optional"/>
>
> Hm.  Taking a look at the schema definition at the start of Sec 3,
> shouldn't the default namespace be the "-instance" verson?  And
> shouldn't there be something like
> "xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" ?  So that would make
> base64Binary be "xsd:base64Binary"

I suppose one could ... but why? I'm following conventions used in xmldsig 
that were used elsewhere and that haven't had any problems with yet [1].

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv?docAddrs=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FEncryption%2F2001%2FDrafts%2Fxmlenc-core%2Fenc-example.xml+http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FEncryption%2F2001%2FDrafts%2Fxmlenc-core%2Fxenc-schema.xsd&style=offline
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 16:40:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:04 UTC