Friday, 22 December 2006
- [Bug 2842] RQ-134 Origin of inherited portions of content model (scd-origin-inheritance)
- [Bug 2195] R-202: How many components are there for complextype extensions?
- [Bug 2244] R-252: Final/block, transitivity and restriction
Wednesday, 20 December 2006
Friday, 15 December 2006
- [Bug 4089] Some RFCs in "normative references" are not used
- [Bug 4087] XPath used for "assertion" should not use "token"
- [Bug 4087] XPath used for "assertion" should not use "token"
Monday, 11 December 2006
Friday, 8 December 2006
- [Bug 2855] RQ-30 Allow negative fractionDigits (negative-scale)
- Re: precision decimal in Schema Rec
- [Bug 3848] "'-' monthFrag" should not be in the gYear lexical representations production
Monday, 4 December 2006
- [Bug 2781] restriction relation among facet values needed
- [Bug 2246] R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets
- [Bug 4034] don't keep superseded facets
- [Bug 4033] "(constraining) facets" section missing for "date"
Friday, 1 December 2006
- [Bug 3976] floatingPointRound function can be simplified
- [Bug 3587] Possibly confusing examples of decimal numbers
- [Bug 3263] Length facet for binary data types
- [Bug 3261] Binary data types
- [Bug 3259] Definition of gMonthDay
- [Bug 3258] Minor errors/omissions in 3.3.8.4 (dates and times)
- [Bug 3252] Terminology: subsets
- [Bug 3247] Definition of canonical representation of decimal
Friday, 24 November 2006
Wednesday, 22 November 2006
- [Bug 1996] the [schema default] property is half-useless
- [Bug 4004] the [schema default] property is half-useless
- [Bug 3958] Restrict "empty" to "empty-only"?
- [Bug 4003] Restrict "empty" to "empty-only"?
- [Bug 3955] Superfluous block/final values
- [Bug 3890] 3.3.6 ref. to non-existent {prohibited substitutions} of element declaration
- [Bug 4002] 3.3.6 ref. to non-existent {prohibited substitutions} of element declaration
- [Bug 3888] 3.3.1 overconstraining exclusions wording?
- [Bug 4001] 3.3.1 overconstraining exclusions wording?
- [Bug 2852] RQ-22 Add normalized default value for attributes (norm-default)
- [Bug 2835] RQ-121 Clarify behavior for attributes that are both fixed and prohibited (prohibited-and-fixed)
- [Bug 2802] Public/system IDs on Notation
- [Bug 4000] Public/system IDs on Notation
- [Bug 2663] wd-1: "constructed from ID" vs. "derived from ID" in Structures
- [Bug 2578] What does last paragraph of 3.2.5 mean?
- [Bug 3999] What does last paragraph of 3.2.5 mean?
- [Bug 2320] Superfluous attribute "type" on attribute prohibitions in the S4S
- [Bug 3998] Superfluous attribute "type" on attribute prohibitions in the S4S
- [Bug 2317] Clarify ID/IDREF rules for unions and lists
- [Bug 2229] R-237: Possible errors in the S4S
- [Bug 3997] R-237: Possible errors in the S4S
- [Bug 3996] R-230: Question on maxOccurs=0, particles and restriction
- [Bug 3995] ID/IDREF with xsi:nil
- [Bug 3994] value constraints with type ENTITY/ENTITIES
- [Bug 3993] Interaction between "skip" and identity constraints
- [Bug 2222] R-230: Question on maxOccurs=0, particles and restriction
- [Bug 2040] ID/IDREF with xsi:nil
- [Bug 2039] value constraints with type ENTITY/ENTITIES
Tuesday, 21 November 2006
Saturday, 18 November 2006
- [Bug 3850] Two definitions of "constraining facet(s)"
- [Bug 2220] R-228: Suggestion for changes in fractionDigits example in part 2
- [Bug 3813] Editorial: correct misuse of 'lexical mapping'
- [Bug 3225] Value spaces as abstractions
- [Bug 2989] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: floatingPointRound function
- [Bug 2408] Consistency need wrt "forbidden" and "must be absent"
- [Bug 2220] R-228: Suggestion for changes in fractionDigits example in part 2
Friday, 17 November 2006
Friday, 10 November 2006
- [Bug 3970] Assertions: Wording of the actual draft
- [Bug 3969] Assertions: problems with basic concepts
- [Bug 3968] Elements with duplicate IDs
- [Bug 3968] Elements with duplicate IDs
Thursday, 9 November 2006
Wednesday, 8 November 2006
- [Bug 3964] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)"
- [Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)"
Tuesday, 7 November 2006
Monday, 6 November 2006
- [Bug 3955] Superfluous block/final values
- [Bug 3955] Superfluous block/final values
- [Bug 3954] Indirect circularity of union and restriction should be banned
- [Bug 2832] RQ-159 Key fields matching urtype (anyKey)
- [Bug 2170] Questions viz. when fields match element with the ur-type
Sunday, 5 November 2006
- [Bug 2781] restriction relation among facet values needed
- [Bug 2246] R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets
- [Bug 2263] RQ-143: Attribute Validated by Type refers to 'strictly assessed'
- [Bug 2827] RQ-143 Question about assessment outcome for attributes (AssessmentOfAtts)
Saturday, 4 November 2006
- [Bug 2223] R-231: Enumeration restrictions are unclear
- [Bug 2246] R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets
- [Bug 2223] R-231: Enumeration restrictions are unclear
- [Bug 3950] {fixed} is redundant for length
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions (editorial)
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions (editorial)
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions (editorial)
- [Bug 3229] Lexical mapping for a union type
- [Bug 3227] Mapping value space to lexical space
Friday, 3 November 2006
Thursday, 2 November 2006
- [Bug 3945] Ability to "deprecate" elements in a schema
- [Bug 3031] The Built-in Datatype Hierarchy diagram
- [Bug 3258] Minor errors/omissions in 3.3.8.4 (dates and times)
Wednesday, 1 November 2006
- [Bug 3942] Define datatypes in formal definition?
- [Bug 3258] Minor errors/omissions in 3.3.8.4 (dates and times)
Monday, 30 October 2006
- [Bug 3892] 3.4.1 - ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl.
- [Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent
- [Bug 3890] 3.3.6 ref. to non-existent {prohibited substitutions} of element declaration
- [Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial)
- [Bug 3888] section 3.3.1 - overconstraining exclusions wording?
- [Bug 3887] section 3.10.4 - errors in wildcard namespace check
- [Bug 2911] Editorial WD 2006-02-17: pattern valid
- [Bug 2911] Editorial WD 2006-02-17: pattern valid
- [Bug 2401] Use new term 'owner' more widely, maybe
Saturday, 28 October 2006
- [Bug 3877] Limits on dayTimeDuration
- [Bug 3877] Limits on dayTimeDuration
- [Bug 3877] Limits on dayTimeDuration
Friday, 27 October 2006
- [Bug 2782] Structures description of anySimpleType needs work
- [Bug 2730] error in Structures 2.2.3.2: content models for mixed content
- [Bug 2242] R-250: 2E PER: Comments on rcase-MapAndSum
- [Bug 2196] R-204: ComplexType mapping rule issue: min=max=0
- [Bug 2846] RQ-142 Are non-required PSVI properties forbidden? (PSVIProp)
- [Bug 2199] R-207: Question about wildcard restriction
- [Bug 3870] R-207: Question about wildcard restriction (1.0)
- [Bug 2834] RQ-99 Allow an element to be in more than one substitution group (mult-subs-grps)
- [Bug 3077] Editorial nit
- [Bug 3869] Annotation mapping for simple type and facets
- [Bug 2235] R-243: Can an attribute prohibited by restriction be added back through a subsequent extension?
- [Bug 2228] R-236: whitespace facet constrains value space of integer?
Wednesday, 25 October 2006
- [Bug 2521] Numbering regular expressions in Appendix H
- [Bug 3033] Canonical form for float/double should match F&O semantics.
Tuesday, 24 October 2006
Monday, 23 October 2006
- [Bug 3120] precisionDecimal vs QT Data Model
- [Bug 3080] Request that Schema 1.1 not advance until discussions held re: precisionDecimal
- [Bug 2730] error in Structures 2.2.3.2: content models for mixed content
- [Bug 3258] Minor errors/omissions in 3.3.8.4 (dates and times)
Saturday, 21 October 2006
- [Bug 2203] R-211: The {attributes} property on the Annotation schema component
- [Bug 2851] RQ-19 Correctly handle annotations in the PSVI (annotation-psvi)
- [Bug 2848] RQ-14 Provide schema component for selector/field annotations (id-inconsistency)
- [Bug 2841] RQ-131 Ordering for {annotations} property (scd-ordering-annotation)
- [Bug 2840] RQ-130 Lost annotations (scd-lost-annotation)
- [Bug 2154] R-158: topLevelAttribute and use=(optional|prohibited|required)
- [Bug 2956] Other annotation fixes to support data binding
- [Bug 2866] RQ-97 Allow typed wildcards (typed-wildcards)
- [Bug 2857] RQ-7 Improve interaction between wildcards and substitution groups (wildcards)
- [Bug 2328] Should "restriction" always imply "subsumption"?
- [Bug 2235] R-243: Can an attribute prohibited by restriction be added back through a subsequent extension?
- [Bug 2957] XML Query untyped values
- [Bug 2215] R-223: Suggested change to an example in Structures
- [Bug 2731] Str 3.1.2 schema documents and the XMLSchema namespace
- [Bug 2616] Error in XML mapping for target namespace of local attributes, sec. 3.2.2
- [Bug 2891] Element being valid without satisfying its {type definition}
- [Bug 2829] RQ-156 Outlaw complex types with mixed simple content (mixedSimple)
Friday, 20 October 2006
Thursday, 19 October 2006
- [Bug 2497] R-127: Distinction between 00:00:00 and 24:00:00 for time datatype?
- [Bug 3851] bug in ·newDateTime· function
- [Bug 3850] Two definitions of "constraining facet(s)"
Wednesday, 18 October 2006
- [Bug 3848] "'-' monthFrag" should not be in the gYear lexical representations production
- XML Schema Pt 1. Ed. 2 section 3.4.1 - ambiguous/erroneous specification
Tuesday, 17 October 2006
- [Bug 1974] Our published names for datatypes etc. don't resolve
- [Bug 2203] R-211: The {attributes} property on the Annotation schema component
Monday, 16 October 2006
- [Bug 3840] Mistaken id in appendix C.1: string.preserve
- [Bug 3839] Mistaken id in sForS: string.preserve
- [Bug 1974] Our published names for datatypes etc. don't resolve
- Re: precision decimal in Schema Rec
Sunday, 15 October 2006
- Re: precision decimal in Schema Rec
- [Bug 2855] RQ-30 Allow negative fractionDigits (negative-scale)
- [Bug 2858] RQ-140 Distinguish negative from positive zero. (negative-positive-zero)
Saturday, 14 October 2006
- [Bug 2544] RQ-146: needs clarification re. wildcards
- [Bug 2203] R-211: The {attributes} property on the Annotation schema component
- [Bug 2851] RQ-19 Correctly handle annotations in the PSVI (annotation-psvi)
- [Bug 2848] RQ-14 Provide schema component for selector/field annotations (id-inconsistency)
- [Bug 2841] RQ-131 Ordering for {annotations} property (scd-ordering-annotation)
- [Bug 2840] RQ-130 Lost annotations (scd-lost-annotation)
- [Bug 2215] R-223: Suggested change to an example in Structures
- [Bug 2731] Str 3.1.2 schema documents and the XMLSchema namespace
- [Bug 2616] Error in XML mapping for target namespace of local attributes, sec. 3.2.2
- [Bug 2891] Element being valid without satisfying its {type definition}
- [Bug 2829] RQ-156 Outlaw complex types with mixed simple content (mixedSimple)
- [Bug 3725] Editorial: 'context-determined declarations' needs work
- [Bug 3054] Availability of type definition
- [Bug 3519] Define 'weakened' wildcards
- [Bug 3817] Processor profiles for following/not following schemaLocation
- [Bug 3816] Should we mention support for full Schematron in xsd:appinfo
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bug 3246] Leading plus sign
- [Bug 3246] Leading plus sign
- [Bug 3246] Leading plus sign
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
Friday, 13 October 2006
Thursday, 12 October 2006
Wednesday, 11 October 2006
- [Bug 3817] Processor profiles for following/not following schemaLocation
- [Bug 3816] Should we mention support for full Schematron in xsd:appinfo
- XML Schema Pt 1. Ed. 2 section 3.3.6 error - ref. to non-existent {prohibited substitutions} of element decl.
- [Bug 2204] R-212: Question about VR Element Locally Valid (Element) in Structures 3.3.4
- [Bug 2154] R-158: topLevelAttribute and use=(optional|prohibited|required)
- [Bug 1996] the [schema default] property is half-useless
- [Bug 2741] wd-13: Underspecification in fallback to lax processing
Tuesday, 10 October 2006
- [Bug 3813] Editorial: correct misuse of 'lexical mapping'
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
Monday, 9 October 2006
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bug 3714] Over-general description of [element declaration] etc
- [Bug 2505] RQ-145 Add a "value" PSVI property
- [Bug 2830] RQ-157 Specify infoset fixups, or specify that they don't occur (infosetFixup)
- [Bug 2105] Schema infoset fix-ups
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bug 3225] Value spaces as abstractions
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bug 3225] Value spaces as abstractions
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions (editorial)
- [Bug 3813] Editorial: correct misuse of 'lexical mapping'
- [Bug 3813] Editorial: correct misuse of 'lexical mapping'
- L Schema Pt 1. Ed. 2 section 3.3.1 - overconstraining wording?
- [Bug 3025] Lexical mappings are not necessarily functions (editorial)
- [Bug 3243] Definition of anySimpleType
- [Bug 3243] Definition of anySimpleType
- [Bug 3813] Editorial: correct misuse of 'lexical mapping'
- [Bug 2970] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: merge precisionDecimal and decimal
Friday, 6 October 2006
- XML Schema Pt 1. Ed. 2 section 3.10.4 - errors in wildcard namespace check
- [Bug 2911] Editorial WD 2006-02-17: pattern valid
- [Bug 2970] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: merge precisionDecimal and decimal
- [Bug 3714] Over-general description of [element declaration] etc
Wednesday, 4 October 2006
Monday, 2 October 2006
- [Bug 2577] xsi loc = redefine loc -- what happens?
- [Bug 3040] Date and dateTime formats do not allow some valid ISO 8601 values