- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:28:36 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2781 ------- Comment #4 from davep@iit.edu 2006-12-11 16:28 ------- (In reply to comment #0 and #3) from comment #0: > Clause 1.3.2 of Schema Component Constraint: Derivation Valid > (Restriction, Simple) in section 3.14.6 of Structures reads: > > 1.3.2 If there is a facet of the same kind in the {facets} of the > {base type definition} (call this BF), then the DF's {value} is a > valid restriction of BF's {value} as defined in [XML Schema: > Datatypes]. from comment #3: > For this bug, reference should be made specifically to the various schema > component constraints specified separately within the Datatypes description of > each kind of facet, rather than amorphously to an unspecified definition in the > Datatypes spec. If a Datatypes definition of "valid restriction" is wanted, a > new bug should be entered for it. Perhaps a Note following the clauses of "Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) which says: Note: "Valid restriction" in clause 1.3.2 and 3.1.2.5 means that the facet in question satisfies the constraints given separately in the appropriate subsection of [reference to Datatypes 4.3] which describes that particular kind of facet. Then no change to Datatypes is required.
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 16:28:56 UTC