- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:01:59 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2781 ------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu 2006-11-05 02:01 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Clause 1.3.2 of Schema Component Constraint: Derivation Valid > (Restriction, Simple) in section 3.14.6 of Structures reads: > > 1.3.2 If there is a facet of the same kind in the {facets} of the > {base type definition} (call this BF), then the DF's {value} is a > valid restriction of BF's {value} as defined in [XML Schema: > Datatypes]. > > The concept of one facet value being 'at least as strong as' another > value for the same facet is a very useful one, and it is good that > Structures appeals to it here. The problem is that this is a throw > which the Datatypes spec does not catch very well: the notion is > reasonably well covered with various component constraints about > restrictions that are valid or invalid, but the Datatypes spec does > not provide any single definition for the terminology used in the call > from Structures, or for any other term for the concept. See discussion, comment 5 of bug 2246. This needs to be harmonized with 3.15.6, Schema Component Constraint: Simple Type Restriction (Facets).
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 02:02:05 UTC