- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:57:26 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2235 ------- Comment #3 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2006-10-27 14:57 ------- > "nothing removed by a restriction > is subsequently added back by an > extension with a conflicting type > assignment"; At risk of taking time at a valuable point in our process, is there any issue with adding something back in a way that is inconsistent with respect to something other than type? An in consistent value constraint, perhaps (Base has fixed="a", nth step derivation has fixed="b")? I haven't researched in detail. If others who are expert think there's no issue here, then let's move past this very quickly. I'm just raising it in case anyone with more detailed knowledge than I have says: "oops, right, badly broken" Thanks. Noah
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 14:57:48 UTC