- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:33:32 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 ------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu 2006-10-23 02:33 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > QT approved comment > In 3.3.8.4, it is not made clear whether 2006-02-20T00:00:00 is equal to, or > identical to, 2006-02-19T24:00:00. > > In 3.3.9.4, it is not made clear whether 00:00:00 is equal to, or identical to, > 24:00:00 (and how this interacts with timezones). I believe that these two parts duplicate or are subsumed by 2497, which is still an open bug. Will consider them resolved/closed/etc. when 2497 is resolved/closed/etc. unless someone objects. (In reply to comment #1) > Agreed, we could be more explicit. A 7-property date/time value cannot have > a minute property whose value is 24; the lexical representation > '2006-02-19T24:00:00' is mapped to (2006,2,20,0,0,0,absent). But there is an error in the lexical mapping, see bug 2851.
Received on Monday, 23 October 2006 02:33:46 UTC