- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:15:24 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2741 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|needsDrafting |resolved Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-10-11 02:15 ------- On 18 February 2005, the Working Group approved a proposal (keyword: 'modals') which among other things changed the relevant conjunction from "if" to "if and only if". In the status-quo document, this paragraph now reads If the item cannot be strictly assessed, because neither clause 1.1 nor clause 1.2 above are satisfied, [Definition:] an element information item's schema validity must be laxly assessed if and only if its context-determined declaration is not skip by validating with respect to the ur-type definition as per Element Locally Valid (Type) (§3.3.4). (The change from 'may' to 'must' was a separate change, approved in August 2006 at the face to face meeting.) Accordingly, I'm not reclassifying this issue as 'resolved / fixed'. If either of the two original principals (Sandy Gao or Henry Thompson), or for that matter anyone else, believes this issue has been wrongly decided, they should re-open it. If SG or HST believe the decision resolves the original issue, they should change the status of the issue to 'closed'.
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 02:15:32 UTC