- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:02:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2244
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|unclassified |resolved
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-12-22 17:02 -------
The WG agreed that the type RestrictOKorNot is not legal, and that it
should not be. The chain of derivation from bottom to top has some
non-restriction steps, and that means it should not be OK to
substitute bottom for top in the restriction.
The WG decided to make no change here. The originator of the
comment, Henry Thompson, agrees.
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 17:02:34 UTC