www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2004 by author

Alan Plum

• [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] (Thursday, 8 April)

Ashok Malhotra

• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? (Tuesday, 11 May)
• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? (Tuesday, 11 May)
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER (Monday, 3 May)
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER (Monday, 3 May)

Bob Foster

• Protest the \- change (E2-18) (Wednesday, 7 April)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• reference to IRI-to-URI algorithm (Monday, 14 June)

Daniel Barclay

• XML schema draft comments: pt.0 2.2.3 apostrophes in plural (Friday, 18 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.4.2 confused wording (Thursday, 17 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.4 A and B or C ambiguous (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 D ambigous required info. items (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 5.1 inverted logic (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.3.2 unparseable wording? (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.3 wording: unclear, imprecise (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 unclear what's optional (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 <include>d (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 <include>d (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 unclear punctuation (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2 clarifying "->" (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.1 editorial (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.6 (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.5 schema components info. item or property? (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 editorial - "none" used as plural (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.4 unclear punctuation (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.5 confused wording (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 typo, punctuation, picky grammar (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 editorial - "none" used as plural (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 child or descendant type definitions? (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.6 production "S" reference (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.5 confused wording (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.1 editorial - various (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.4 mustFind not a decl., not defined; improve wording pattern (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.2 values not distinguished from text (Wednesday, 16 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.1 editorial (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.8.1 unparseable wording (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.8.1 typo (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.4.1 unclear wording pattern (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.3.6 pair canonical form undefined? (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.3.4 typo "becauseone" (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.3.2 either-or wrong, "contains" misleading (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.2.5 ambiguous grouping (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.2.2 {attr. decl.} not quite specified (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 2.2.1.2 editorial "to base type" (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 2.3 editorial - commas (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 1.3 editorial "together with" not plural (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.4.1 editorial - comma (Tuesday, 15 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.2.2 (Monday, 14 June)
• XML schema draft comments: forgot "2E PER" in subject line (Friday, 11 June)
• XML schema draft comments: appendix F typo "Quanitifer" (Friday, 11 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 1.5, 5 confusing missing plurals (Friday, 11 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.3.6.1 property vs. value of property (Friday, 11 June)
• XML schema draft comments: (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.5.1, etc. wording pattern ambiguous, hard to follow (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.4.1 minLength on list? (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.5 misaligned definition (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.4.1 ambiguous: "one", "either" (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.2.1 ambiguous wording (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.2 typo "an partial order" (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.2 circular definition? (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.1 confused wording? (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: 4.1.2.1: what if both base and simpleType? (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 4.1.2.1: what if both base and simpleType? (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt. 2: refer to part to doc. conventions (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.3.13 type: "0and" (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.3.7 "colonized" (clarity) (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: pt. 2 3.3.1 how to refer to excluded whitespace characters (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.18 mapping not defined (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: "space-separated" ambiguous (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.15.1: hexBinary example octets not clear (Thursday, 10 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.12.11: "--MM-DD" (Wednesday, 9 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: 3.2.8 wording problem (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.8 wording problem (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.6.1 wording problem (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: "pattern" -> "regular expression"? (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: punctuation/grammatical error changing meaning (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: is list canonical form underspecified? (Wednesday, 9 June)
• XML schema draft comments: "space-separated" ambiguous (Wednesday, 9 June)

Dave Peterson

• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.5 schema components info. item or property? (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 editorial - "none" used as plural (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: 3.2.12.11: "--MM-DD" (Thursday, 10 June)
• Re: XML schema draft comments: "space-separated" ambiguous (Wednesday, 9 June)
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER (Monday, 3 May)
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER (Monday, 3 May)
• float and double bounded facet value, new 1.0 error not caught by 2E (Monday, 3 May)
• float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER (Monday, 3 May)
• 1.0 error in bounded facet, not corrected in 2E PER (Sunday, 2 May)
• Re: XML Schema Decimal Types (Sunday, 18 April)

Dean Hiller

• no answers to versioning and extension (Friday, 11 June)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• Comments on XML Schema: Component Designators (version of March 9 2004) (Wednesday, 7 April)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: XML schema draft comments: forgot "2E PER" in subject line (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Section 3.3.3: language (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: no answers to versioning and extension (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: two more typos in Part 2 of PER (Thursday, 27 May)
• Re: bracket missing in pattern for lexical space of xs:language (Thursday, 27 May)
• {scope} and born-binary (Friday, 14 May)
• Re: Clarify merge/union of facets (Friday, 2 April)

jcowan@reutershealth.com

• Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] (Thursday, 15 April)
• [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] (Wednesday, 14 April)

Jonathan Marsh

• XML Schema 2E PER review from WSDesc WG (Wednesday, 14 April)

Jose Kahan

• XML Schema PER: comments from the XKMS WG (Friday, 2 April)

Michael Kay

• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? (Tuesday, 11 May)
• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? (Tuesday, 11 May)
• Is "." a valid xs:decimal? (Tuesday, 11 May)
• [2E PER] Attribute Wildcards: numbering problem (Saturday, 3 April)

Mike Cowlishaw

• Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] (Thursday, 15 April)

mogul@pa.dec.com

• Server Error (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org) (Monday, 5 April)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Proposed schema issue: clarify definition of "restriction" (Thursday, 13 May)
• Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] (Wednesday, 14 April)

Norman Walsh

• Proposed erratum or addition to XML Schema 1.1: support for ignorable whitespace (Wednesday, 2 June)

Orion Adrian

• Re: Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs? (Wednesday, 14 April)

Paul.V.Biron@kp.org

• Geschrieben von Margrit am 07. April 2004 (Tuesday, 15 June)

Simon Cox

• Correction Re: Using XML Schema components in application languages (Wednesday, 7 April)
• Using XMLSchema.xsd in application schemas (Wednesday, 7 April)

Ulrich.Post@softwareag.com

• Section 3.3.3: language (Wednesday, 16 June)

Xan Gregg

• value of pattern facet (Thursday, 1 April)
• Clarify merge/union of facets (Thursday, 1 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:01:09 UTC