- From: Daniel Barclay <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:02:11 -0400
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Regarding the draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-1-20040318/: Section 4.1 says: ... (note not a ·schema document·) ... (not the possible parse like "ask not what your country can do for you") instead of saying: ... (note: not a ·schema document·) ... A sentence begins: ·assessment· is defined with reference to ... Could such occurrences use standard capitalization? (Would any automated linking or human interpretation of dot-highlighted terms break?) Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2004 14:02:41 UTC