www-rdf-interest@w3.org from January 2000 by date

Monday, 31 January 2000

• Re: Can propertyElt have descriptions+? (WAS: RDF in real life: Revised XML/RDF-Schema of the G2k-Namespace) Sergey Melnik
• Re: XMLCAL Tim Berners-Lee
• Can propertyElt have descriptions+? (WAS: RDF in real life: Revised XML/RDF-Schema of the G2k-Namespace) Perry A. Caro
• Re: BICI, a new "legacy" Identifier Francis Cave

Sunday, 30 January 2000

• Re: BICI, a new "legacy" Identifier Mark Needleman - DRA

Saturday, 29 January 2000

• BICI, a new "legacy" Identifier Eric Hellman

Friday, 28 January 2000

• RE: assymetric reference of properties Eric Hellman

Thursday, 28 January 2094

• RE: assymetric reference of properties Nancy E. Kent

Friday, 28 January 2000

• RE: assymetric reference of properties Jeff Sussna
• Re: assymetric reference of properties martin
• Re: assymetric reference of properties Eric Hellman

Thursday, 27 January 2000

• RDF in real life: Revised XML/RDF-Schema of the G2k-Namespace Thomas Bandholtz

Wednesday, 26 January 2000

• assymetric reference of properties martin

Monday, 24 January 2000

• RDF correctness? Will Sargent
• Re: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Eric Hellman
• Re: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Dan Connolly
• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Ron Daniel
• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Ron Daniel
• RDF SCHEMA Michele Alfieri
• RE: RDF question: accessing xml:lang Jarno Elovirta
• Re: Places & Naming Conventions Thomas Bandholtz

Friday, 21 January 2000

• Re: Places & Naming Conventions Raphael Malyankar
• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Dan Connolly
• SV: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Greg FitzPatrick
• Re: NameNet LocatioNet ??? heiko.grussbach@crpht.lu
• Re: NameNet LocatioNet ??? Simon Cox
• Re: NameNet LocatioNet ??? heiko.grussbach@crpht.lu

Thursday, 20 January 2000

• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Places & Naming Conventions Charles McCathieNevile
• Places & Naming Conventions WorldNet
• Re: NameNet LocatioNet ??? Raphael Malyankar
• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Ron Daniel
• Re: NameNet LocatioNet ??? Simon Cox
• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Paskin, Norman
• Re: RDF question: accessing xml:lang Janne Saarela
• Re: RDF question: accessing xml:lang Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

Wednesday, 19 January 2000

• Re: Arguments against digest URIs Sergey Melnik
• Re: RDF question: accessing xml:lang Sergey Melnik
• RE: URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Jeff Sussna
• RDF example Michele Alfieri
• URI equivalence, URI's for "standard" identifiers Eric Hellman

Tuesday, 18 January 2000

• mozilla.org to Include Open Source Security Technology, Completing Feature Set Of Open Source Browser (fwd) Dan Brickley
• RE: RDF in OO-databases Didier PH Martin
• Re: List Organization Andy Powell
• Re: List Organization Ralph R. Swick
• Re: List Organization William Song
• RE: List Organization Dimitris Dimitriadis
• List Organization R.van.Dort@Everest.nl
• SV: search for typical RDF application Greg FitzPatrick

Monday, 17 January 2000

• search for typical RDF application Jean Marc VANEL
• search for typical RDF application Jean Marc VANEL
• RE: RDF in OO-databases Mark Birbeck
• NameNet LocatioNet ??? heiko.grussbach@crpht.lu

Friday, 14 January 2000

• RDF schema Edilene Aparecida Veneruchi

Wednesday, 12 January 2000

• typing of property Lars Dannstedt

Sunday, 9 January 2000

• RE: RDF in OO-databases Didier PH Martin
• sirpac proposal (concrete) Stefan Haustein
• some problem about Streaming-Based Sirpac.... Jodie
• Re: RDF in OO-databases Durk Gardenier

Saturday, 8 January 2000

• Re: categorization scheme for dublin_core Subject Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF in OO-databases Dan Brickley
• categorization scheme for dublin_core Subject Jean-Marc Vanel

Friday, 7 January 2000

• RDF in OO-databases heiko.grussbach@crpht.lu
• about open directory Jodie

Thursday, 6 January 2000

• RE: What if I don't jump over the cliff? Jeff Sussna
• What if I don't jump over the cliff? Jeff Sussna
• RE: Peering over the edge of the RDF cliff Jeff Sussna
• RE: Peering over the edge of the RDF cliff Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
• Re: Saying anything about anything: Comments on Harle & Fensel Gabe Beged-Dov
• RE: is a missing triple a constraint violation? Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
• Re: Saying anything about anything: Comments on Harle & Fensel Ralph R. Swick

Wednesday, 5 January 2000

• RE: Peering over the edge of the RDF cliff Jeff Sussna
• RE: Peering over the edge of the RDF cliff Jeff Sussna
• Re: RDF parsing without the building the SiRPAC model Stefan Haustein
• Re: Peering over the edge of the RDF cliff Perry A. Caro
• Peering over the edge of the RDF cliff Jeff Sussna
• Re: Saying anything about anything: Comments on Harle & Fensel Jonas Liljegren
• is a missing triple a constraint violation? Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Handling bad RDF descriptions Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: RDF parsing without the building the SiRPAC model Gabe Beged-Dov
• Re: RDF parsing without the building the SiRPAC model uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com

Tuesday, 4 January 2000

• RDF and XML, Versioning, Namespaces, and Types Sean Luke
• Handling bad RDF descriptions Jonas Liljegren
• Re: URIs vs URLs? Jonas Liljegren
• URI aliases Jonas Liljegren
• RE: Followup 2: The Heart of RDF Darkness Jeff Sussna
• Re: RDF parsing without the building the SiRPAC model Stefan Haustein

Monday, 3 January 2000

• Re: RDF parsing without the building the SiRPAC model uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com

Sunday, 2 January 2000

• Re: Anonymous and unknown URIs Jonas Liljegren
• Arguments against digest URIs Jonas Liljegren

Saturday, 1 January 2000

• RDF parsing without the building the SiRPAC model Stefan Haustein

Last message date: Monday, 31 January 2000 17:19:33 UTC