- From: Eric Hellman <eric@openly.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:10:23 -0500
- To: RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Forgive me if I've missed something obvious, but... Is there any consensus in the RDF community about what URI's to use for standard identifiers such as ISBN, ISSN, UPC codes, or for things like Stock tickers, cusips, patent numbers? It's not like it would take much effort. Assuming the answer is "not yet", I'd like to suggest a rather fundamental addition to RDF core properties. It seems to me that everyone should at least agree how to say that two URI's refer to the same thing. In other word, we need a universal property to be able to make the assertion that resource X is equivalent to resource Y. Something like: <?xml version='1.0'?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-schema-19990303#" > <rdf:Description ID="equivalent"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/> <rdfs:comment>This property expresses the equivalence of 2 resources.</rdfs:comment> </rdf:Description> Example: <rdf:Description about="http://linkbaton.com/get?genre=book&item=0062515861"> <equivalent rdf:resource="http://linkbaton.com/get?item=0062515861&genre=book"> </rdf:Description> I hope the answer is something like "Working Group XYZ is working on this" Eric Eric Hellman Openly Informatics, Inc. http://www.openly.com/ 21st Century Information Infrastructure LinkBaton: Your Shortcuts to Information http://linkbaton.com/
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2000 01:10:37 UTC