- From: Jeff Sussna <jeff.sussna@quokka.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:48:57 -0800
- To: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Oops, my example should have had a parseType="Resource" as part of the author property. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Sussna Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 10:48 AM To: 'www-rdf-interest@w3.org' Subject: What if I don't jump over the cliff? A practical question: if I stick with current RDF syntax, and write something like <rdf:Description ID="foo.html"> <author ID="foo_author"> <object resource="Fred"/> </author> </rdf:Description> because I can't write <rdf:Description ID="foo.html"> <author ID="foo_author" resource="Fred"/> </rdf:Description> what if anything do I lose from a parsing point of view? In other words, does something like SirPAC gain any special knowledge from the resourceAttr? Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jeffrey E. Sussna Chief Architect Quokka Sports, Inc. Digital Sports Entertainment 128 Spear St. Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94105 USA +1 415 369 4286 http://www.quokka.com jeff.sussna@quokka.com
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2000 13:48:31 UTC