- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 14:27:06 -0800
- To: caro@Adobe.COM
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
IMO the answer is no; this is another bug in SiRPAC. Sergey "Perry A. Caro" wrote: > > I wrote to Thomas privately to point out that his g2k:topic property was > invalid, because its value contains two rdf:Description nodes. He wrote > back indicating that SirPAC accepts it just fine, so what was I talking > about? > > Sure enough, I took the following winnowed example and gave it to SirPAC, > and it didn't complain: > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding="iso-8859-1"?> > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:g2k = "http://www.gein.de/2000/profile-02#"> > <rdf:Description about = "http://www.any-mu.de/doc" xml:lang = > "de"> > <g2k:topic> > <rdf:Description about = "top/111" > > <g2k:term> umwelt </g2k:term> > <g2k:rank> 10 </g2k:rank> > </rdf:Description > > <rdf:Description about = "top/222"> > <g2k:term> schutz </g2k:term> > <g2k:rank> 5 </g2k:rank> > </rdf:Description > > </g2k:topic> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > > ======================================= > > Somebody is wrong, but I can't tell if it is SirPAC, my interpretation of > the formal RDF grammer BNF, or the formal grammer BNF itself. Production > [6.12] of the RDF formal grammar says propertyElt can have a "value", > singular. Production [6.17] says value can be "obj" singular. Production > [6.2] says obj can be "description", singular. > > My RDF parser barfs on the example above. Does SirPAC know something that I > don't? > > Perry
Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 17:19:33 UTC