- From: Perry A. Caro <caro@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:40:02 -0800
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I wrote to Thomas privately to point out that his g2k:topic property was invalid, because its value contains two rdf:Description nodes. He wrote back indicating that SirPAC accepts it just fine, so what was I talking about? Sure enough, I took the following winnowed example and gave it to SirPAC, and it didn't complain: <?xml version='1.0' encoding="iso-8859-1"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:g2k = "http://www.gein.de/2000/profile-02#"> <rdf:Description about = "http://www.any-mu.de/doc" xml:lang = "de"> <g2k:topic> <rdf:Description about = "top/111" > <g2k:term> umwelt </g2k:term> <g2k:rank> 10 </g2k:rank> </rdf:Description > <rdf:Description about = "top/222"> <g2k:term> schutz </g2k:term> <g2k:rank> 5 </g2k:rank> </rdf:Description > </g2k:topic> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> ======================================= Somebody is wrong, but I can't tell if it is SirPAC, my interpretation of the formal RDF grammer BNF, or the formal grammer BNF itself. Production [6.12] of the RDF formal grammar says propertyElt can have a "value", singular. Production [6.17] says value can be "obj" singular. Production [6.2] says obj can be "description", singular. My RDF parser barfs on the example above. Does SirPAC know something that I don't? Perry
Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 14:39:57 UTC