- From: Perry A. Caro <caro@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:40:02 -0800
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I wrote to Thomas privately to point out that his g2k:topic property was
invalid, because its value contains two rdf:Description nodes. He wrote
back indicating that SirPAC accepts it just fine, so what was I talking
about?
Sure enough, I took the following winnowed example and gave it to SirPAC,
and it didn't complain:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:g2k = "http://www.gein.de/2000/profile-02#">
<rdf:Description about = "http://www.any-mu.de/doc" xml:lang =
"de">
<g2k:topic>
<rdf:Description about = "top/111" >
<g2k:term> umwelt </g2k:term>
<g2k:rank> 10 </g2k:rank>
</rdf:Description >
<rdf:Description about = "top/222">
<g2k:term> schutz </g2k:term>
<g2k:rank> 5 </g2k:rank>
</rdf:Description >
</g2k:topic>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
=======================================
Somebody is wrong, but I can't tell if it is SirPAC, my interpretation of
the formal RDF grammer BNF, or the formal grammer BNF itself. Production
[6.12] of the RDF formal grammar says propertyElt can have a "value",
singular. Production [6.17] says value can be "obj" singular. Production
[6.2] says obj can be "description", singular.
My RDF parser barfs on the example above. Does SirPAC know something that I
don't?
Perry
Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 14:39:57 UTC