- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:32:53 -0500
- To: R.van.Dort@Everest.nl
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 12:19 PM 1/18/2000 +0100, R.van.Dort@Everest.nl wrote: >This mailing group seems to be getting quite popular with over a hundred >messages in the previous two months. yes, this is wonderful. >It should be our challenge to create an RDF-based infrastructure for our >own mailing group :-) I am sure many of us share this same vision >Aiming at somewhere closer, is it possible to split up the mailing group in >a number of themes ... if you mean 'create additional lists', I would rather not do that. >... start the new month with a couple of empty messages, one per theme, each >creating a thread. why wait for a month boundary? Perhaps a collection of message classes such as you propose could simply be used in the Subject headers; e.g. Subject: [ig:applications] My favorite new toy Subject: [ig:syntax] Yet another proposal Subject: [ig:trust] A proposal for a trust vocabulary where, of course, xmlns:ig="http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/topic-ns-1#" >This would bring some order in our "chaos". Good idea? Anything that adds more explicit semantic information to message metadata is a good idea in my book :-) Too bad most of our mail user agents don't let us experiment with better metadata mechanisms than the insufficient "[...]" markup. -Ralph
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2000 09:34:32 UTC