- From: Jarno Elovirta <jarnose@evitech.fi>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:14:47 +0200
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > Any opinions about how xml:lang is to be treated correctly?
>
> Our RDF Parser module [1] associates the language information
> with a Literal node within the data model. This means there
> are no additional arcs and nodes but an additional indicator
> for any Literal node about its language.
>
> Try running the demonstration [2] and adding the xml:lang
> attribute by hand to see how the language is indicated.
Having tried your demo, am I to assume that:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/"
xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/qualifiers/1.0/"
xmlns:vc="http://imc.org/vCard/3.0#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="">
<dc:subject>
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li xml:lang="en" parseType="Resource">
<dcq:subjectType>Keywords</dcq:subjectType>
<rdf:value>nice keywords; more nice keywords</rdf:value>
</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
</dc:subject>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
, is wrong - or? I suppose I could do the same but with the xml:lang
attribute in the rdf:value element, but would it be the same? What I want to
do is state that the list item of the Bag itself is of some specified
language, treat the list item as an object of sort, with a language
attribute. Your demo will not in this case show the xml:lang.
Jarno Elovirta
Research & Development
Espoo-Vantaa Institute of Technology
email: jarno.elovirta@evitech.fi
tel: +358 9 511 9845
Received on Monday, 24 January 2000 08:10:10 UTC