- From: Jarno Elovirta <jarnose@evitech.fi>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:14:47 +0200
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > Any opinions about how xml:lang is to be treated correctly? > > Our RDF Parser module [1] associates the language information > with a Literal node within the data model. This means there > are no additional arcs and nodes but an additional indicator > for any Literal node about its language. > > Try running the demonstration [2] and adding the xml:lang > attribute by hand to see how the language is indicated. Having tried your demo, am I to assume that: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/qualifiers/1.0/" xmlns:vc="http://imc.org/vCard/3.0#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dc:subject> <rdf:Bag> <rdf:li xml:lang="en" parseType="Resource"> <dcq:subjectType>Keywords</dcq:subjectType> <rdf:value>nice keywords; more nice keywords</rdf:value> </rdf:li> </rdf:Bag> </dc:subject> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> , is wrong - or? I suppose I could do the same but with the xml:lang attribute in the rdf:value element, but would it be the same? What I want to do is state that the list item of the Bag itself is of some specified language, treat the list item as an object of sort, with a language attribute. Your demo will not in this case show the xml:lang. Jarno Elovirta Research & Development Espoo-Vantaa Institute of Technology email: jarno.elovirta@evitech.fi tel: +358 9 511 9845
Received on Monday, 24 January 2000 08:10:10 UTC