public-webcrypto@w3.org from March 2013 by author

Acar, Tolga

• RE: BigNum API Proposal (Tuesday, 5 March)

Alex Russell

• Re: SubtleCrypto (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - minutes of 18th of March call (Thursday, 21 March)

Anthony Nadalin

• RE: BigNum API Proposal (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: BigNum API Proposal (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)
• BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)

David McGrew (mcgrew)

• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)

GALINDO Virginie

• FW: AlgorithmIdentifier in encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations (Sunday, 31 March)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 1st f april @ 20:00 UTC (tomorrow) (Sunday, 31 March)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - F2F meeting registration and wiki (Friday, 29 March)
• 3GPP liaison request - possible answer (Friday, 29 March)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - minutes of 18th of March call (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: Face-to-face schedule for WebCrypto and WebAppSec meetings (Wednesday, 20 March)
• [to editors] pubrules change for clearer indication of First Public/Last Call Working Draft at top of document (Tuesday, 19 March)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 18th of march @ 20:00 UTC (tomorrow) (Sunday, 17 March)
• [Web Crypto WG] our regular call next monday @20:00 UTC (Friday, 15 March)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - Sodium, a step ahead NaCl (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)

Harry Halpin

• Re: 3GPP liaison request - possible answer (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• PROPOSAL: Charter extension for 9 months (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Proposal for charter extension (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-37 Fwd: [jose] #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto (Monday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Second Call for Github IDs for test-suite (Monday, 4 March)

Mark Watson

• Re: AlgorithmIdentifier in encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations (Saturday, 30 March)
• Re: AlgorithmIdentifier in encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• AlgorithmIdentifier in encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations (Thursday, 28 March)
• SubtleCrypto (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Should wrapped keys always have extractable = false (Monday, 25 March)
• Should wrapped keys always have extractable = false (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Proposed ISSUE: Flatten algorithm identifiers (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Wednesday, 6 March)
• What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-37 Fwd: [jose] #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Saturday, 2 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Friday, 1 March)

Mike Jones

• RE: Face-to-face schedule for WebCrypto and WebAppSec meetings (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Face-to-face schedule for WebCrypto and WebAppSec meetings (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)

Mountie Lee

• Re: Certificate Management Protocol with RFC4210 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Certificate Management Protocol with RFC4210 (Monday, 25 March)
• draft for certificate management (Monday, 4 March)

Nick Van den Bleeken

• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Second Call for Github IDs for test-suite (Monday, 4 March)
• Regrets for todays call (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: draft for certificate management (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Friday, 1 March)
• [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Friday, 1 March)

Richard Barnes

• Re: AlgorithmIdentifier in encrypt/decrypt/sign/verify operations (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: SubtleCrypto (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Race condition? (Monday, 25 March)
• Race condition? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Certificate Management Protocol with RFC4210 (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Should wrapped keys always have extractable = false (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: Face-to-face schedule for WebCrypto and WebAppSec meetings (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Feedback sent to JOSE (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Proposed ISSUE: Flatten algorithm identifiers (Monday, 18 March)
• Proposed ISSUE: Flatten algorithm identifiers (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Charter extension for 9 months (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)
• Algorithm management goals (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our call on monday 4th of march @ 20:00 UTC (today) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-37 Fwd: [jose] #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)

Ryan Sleevi

• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: SubtleCrypto (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Race condition? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Race condition? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Race condition? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Should wrapped keys always have extractable = false (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Proposed ISSUE: Flatten algorithm identifiers (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Anyone at Cryptography Forum Research Group at IETF 86? (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: What happens if input ArrayBufferView changes during a WebCrypto operation ? (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Algorithm management goals (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-37 Fwd: [jose] #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: BigNum API Proposal (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-9 [was Re: ISSUE-30: Key import/export?] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: [WebCrypto Key Discovery] Algorithm names in named keys (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)

Vijay Bharadwaj

• RE: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Key export and an opaque KeyFormat (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Saturday, 2 March)
• RE: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Proposal for key wrap/unwrap (ISSUE-35) (Friday, 1 March)

Wendy Seltzer

• Fwd: [Moderator Action] Re: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Friday, 29 March)
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] RE: On Crypto API Safety in the Hands of Unskilled Developers (Thursday, 28 March)
• Register for WebCrypto F2F April 23-24 in San Jose (Wednesday, 13 March)
• [minutes] Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - monday 4th of march (Monday, 4 March)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2013 21:40:11 UTC