3GPP liaison request - possible answer

Hi all,
We need to answer the 3GPP that we will not help them in their work, as it is too much application specific.
I'll edit some text and make sure they receive it.
Regards,
Virginie

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
Sent: jeudi 7 fvrier 2013 22:41
To: arun@mozilla.com
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org; GALINDO Virginie
Subject: Re: 3GPP liaison request - possible answer


On Feb 7, 2013 1:31 PM, "Arun Ranganathan" <arun@mozilla.com<mailto:arun@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to think of this as not relevant to our work, which focuses on a *web* crypto API, not technologies orthogonal to the scope of the web, and think this is an application layer consideration.  This isn't even a use case we're trying to solve for, unless someone can convince me otherwise.
>
> -- A*

+1

>
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 11:16 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We received in November 2012 a request from 3GPP [1] and I guess that we should consider answering it.
>>
>> The 3GPP is asking us to
>> -          review their javascript API which is managing some use-case specific keys (actually a GBA key used by mobile network operators to generate some credentials for service providers).
>> -          Consider adding their API in our deliverables
>>
>> My answers to the questions would be :
>>
>> -          Maybe, but we need kind volunteer to read their spec  anyone interested in reading draft Technical Report TR 33.823 section 8.2 [2]
>>
>> -          No, this is too much use case specific  any other opinion ?
>>
>> Thanks for providing comments to help me to draft an answer taking into account the WG opinion.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Virginie
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012Nov/0096.html
>> [2] http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/33_series/33.823/33823-c00.zip
>
>

Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 14:23:48 UTC