- From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:44:43 -0800
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > On 03/04/2013 07:22 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote: >>> >>> To re-iterate, I'm not asking about export/import in terms of the WebIDL >>> as >>> currently written. >>> >>> I'm asking about the notion that it is feasible developers may want to >>> read/write key material outside the browser. In which case, there's a >>> privacy angle that needs to be addressed. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure that's where the worries underlying ISSUE-9 come from, >>> and >>> ISSUE-30. >> >> We addressed ISSUE-9 - long ago - by saying it would not, beyond what >> Mark's draft says. This was the entire crux of key discovery. > > > Key Discovery only addresses symmetric pre-provisioned keys last time I > checked. We have not formally closed ISSUE-9 or the import or export of > keys outside of the browser to my extent except in that very limited case. > > We can deal with ISSUE-9 and ISSUE-30 by moving them to the Web Discovery > product. That is not closing them. That is moving the feature to a different > product. > > > >>> If we want to say "import/export" is single-session and ephemeral, that's >>> fine although that eliminates a number of use-cases. When I brought up >>> the >>> fact that all keys are ephemeral at the last telecon, it seemed folks in >>> the >>> WG were surprised and wanted further discussion. >> >> That's what it has said from the beginning. Key import/export has >> always been separate from key discovery - the latter being potential >> issues for ISSUE-9/30, but having absolutely nothing to do with the >> import / export operations as they've ever been written. > > > I'm saying "Key Discovery" is only symmetric keys. That is not the proposal. > The issue is still open > and I don't think has been adequately discussed, but I do sympathize with > just closing it as many in the WG are not actively paying attention. People > need to understand that by closing these, we're limiting ourselves to > pre-provisioned symmetric keys and ephemeral keys. No, we are not. > I understand many in the > WG are not paying that active attention, so I'm bringing this up. When most > people say "import/export" they imagine that it means importing and > exporting outside the browser as well I imagine. > > cheers, > harry >
Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 18:45:10 UTC