Re: 3GPP liaison request - possible answer

With this level of request (i.e. we do not have joint work, although we 
might) a simple informative e-mail from the Chair is sufficient.

We are bound by rules to actually answer requests for information from 
liaison organizations.

   cheers,
      harry

On 03/29/2013 03:23 PM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We need to answer the 3GPP that we will not help them in their work, 
> as it is too much application specific.
>
> I'll edit some text and make sure they receive it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Virginie
>
> *From:*Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
> *Sent:* jeudi 7 février 2013 22:41
> *To:* arun@mozilla.com
> *Cc:* public-webcrypto@w3.org; GALINDO Virginie
> *Subject:* Re: 3GPP liaison request - possible answer
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2013 1:31 PM, "Arun Ranganathan" <arun@mozilla.com 
> <mailto:arun@mozilla.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I'm inclined to think of this as not relevant to our work, which 
> focuses on a *web* crypto API, not technologies orthogonal to the 
> scope of the web, and think this is an application layer 
> consideration.  This isn't even a use case we're trying to solve for, 
> unless someone can convince me otherwise.
> >
> > -- A*
>
> +1
>
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2013, at 11:16 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We received in November 2012 a request from 3GPP [1] and I guess 
> that we should consider answering it.
> >>
> >> The 3GPP is asking us to
> >> -          review their javascript API which is managing some 
> use-case specific keys (actually a GBA key used by mobile network 
> operators to generate some credentials for service providers).
> >> -          Consider adding their API in our deliverables
> >>
> >> My answers to the questions would be :
> >>
> >> -          Maybe, but we need kind volunteer to read their spec à 
> anyone interested in reading draft Technical Report TR 33.823 section 
> 8.2 [2]
> >>
> >> -          No, this is too much use case specific à any other opinion ?
> >>
> >> Thanks for providing comments to help me to draft an answer taking 
> into account the WG opinion.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Virginie
> >>
> >> [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012Nov/0096.html
> >> [2] 
> http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/33_series/33.823/33823-c00.zip
> >
> >
>