[webauthn] cleanup <pre class=anchors> and use <pre class="link-defaults"> as appropriate (#1489)
Re: [webauthn] export definitions? (#1049)
[w3c/webauthn] 550853: Built by Travis-CI: 7839cd073aae5496176c0060c75f4d...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] cfc0e9: Make largeBlobs explicit during create.
[webauthn] new commits pushed by agl
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make largeBlobs explicit during create.
Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
Closed: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174)
Re: [webauthn] Minor cleanups from PR 1270 review (#1291)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Clarify signature format for packed attestations et al
[w3c/webauthn] fcf2c1: Clarify signature format for packed attestations e...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
09/30/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
[webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487)
- Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487)
- Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487)
- Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487)
- Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487)
- Closed: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487)
Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258)
09/23/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363)
[webauthn] changing to "permissions policy" messed up MDN links (#1486)
Closed: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
Closed: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
[w3c/webauthn] 4a1a06: Built by Travis-CI: 6156ba8e00b5a2ff8867008a1e0cd0...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] 6156ba: Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[w3c/webauthn] ba8b0e: Built by Travis-CI: 9e634a8a4e3b30a768cda642452c86...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] 61aaf4: Built by Travis-CI: eef23b1406d45ae95a2984311cd5e2...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] 9e634a: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension (#1481)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[w3c/webauthn] eef23b: Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissi...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473)
Closed: [webauthn] update "feature policy" reference to new name: "permissions policy" (#1473)
[webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
- Closed: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485)
[webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure, from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484)
- Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484)
- Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484)
- Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484)
- Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484)
- Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484)
09/16/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Add note about fixed/empty user handles
- Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483)
- Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483)
- Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483)
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add note about fixed/empty user handles
Re: [webauthn] Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (#1470)
[w3c/webauthn] 2fa8f9: Built by Travis-CI: 570648fa66d4a5451bee011bf3f9b4...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
Fwd: Fall 2020 TPAC event - Registration now open
[w3c/webauthn]
[w3c/webauthn] a08ad9: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAut...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
Closed: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475)
[w3c/webauthn] 84cf69: Make unprotected account detection scenario more r...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[w3c/webauthn] 531de2: Built by Travis-CI: 383971fa7f3ef35936b11fe8dfebbc...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] 383971: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache (#1479)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[webauthn] Pull Request: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension
[w3c/webauthn] 47c935: Built by Travis-CI: ff9c5b03d2397ed10b7a285e068d08...
[w3c/webauthn] d2ce3d: Built by Travis-CI: ff9c5b03d2397ed10b7a285e068d08...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot
[w3c/webauthn] 7107ed: Virtual authenticators extension support
[webauthn] new commits pushed by agl
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Virtual authenticators extension support
Closed: [webauthn] Virtual authenticator support for extensions (#1471)
09/09/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] undefined terms and terms we really ought to define (#462)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts
- Re: [webauthn] Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts (#1480)
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts
[w3c/webauthn] a08ad9: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAut...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[webauthn] Pull Request: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache
Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
- Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
- Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
- Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
- Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
[webauthn] Remove Out-Of-Scope PRF Extension (#1478)
[w3c/webauthn] ef56e0: Add script that uses Docker image to update Bikesh...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[w3c/webauthn] 3ae650: Add script that uses Docker image to update Bikesh...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
[webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477)
- Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477)
- Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477)
- Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477)
- Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477)
TPAC 2020 schedule...
Web Payment Security Interest Group (WPSIG) meeting 6,7-Oct -- WebAuthn WG update?
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
- Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
- Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
- Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
- Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
- Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
- Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
- Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457)
Re: [webauthn] Virtual authenticators extension support (#1472)
Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474)
- Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474)
- Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474)
- Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474)
- Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474)
- Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474)
Re: [webauthn] add additional attestation format(s) from Apple (#1453)
09/02/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422)
- Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422)
- Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422)
- Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422)
- Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422)
- Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475)
- Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475)
- Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475)
- Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475)
- Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475)