- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:00:42 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1kNIza-0003IY-Jt@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/webauthn (+1/-2/💬11) 1 issues created: - Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (by arianvp) https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1487 5 issues received 11 new comments: - #1487 Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (4 by arianvp, ve7jtb) https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1487 - #1485 Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (1 by nicksteele) https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1485 [type:editorial] - #1484 Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (1 by keikoit) https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1484 [type:editorial] - #1363 Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (3 by CrazyChris75, agl) https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1363 [priority:low] [stat:pr-open] [type:technical] - #1258 Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (2 by Kieun, madwizard-thomas) https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1258 [subtype:extensions] [subtype:rp-ops] [subtype:underspecifiedBehaviors] 2 issues closed: - Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1487 - Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1485 [type:editorial] Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/webauthn -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2020 17:00:44 UTC