public-webauthn@w3.org from September 2020 by author

=JeffH

[w3c/webauthn] fcf2c1: Clarify signature format for packed attestations e... (Wednesday, 30 September)

=JeffH via GitHub

[webauthn] cleanup <pre class=anchors> and use <pre class="link-defaults"> as appropriate (#1489) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [webauthn] export definitions? (#1049) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Closed: [webauthn] Add explicit description on what should be done in incognito/private browsing mode (#1174) (Wednesday, 30 September)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Clarify signature format for packed attestations et al (Wednesday, 30 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 30 September)
[webauthn] changing to "permissions policy" messed up MDN links (#1486) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Closed: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add note about fixed/empty user handles (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 16 September)
Closed: [webauthn] Remove Out-Of-Scope PRF Extension (#1478) (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Closed: [webauthn] update "feature policy" reference to new name: "permissions policy" (#1473) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Monday, 14 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Wednesday, 9 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache (Wednesday, 9 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 9 September)
Re: [webauthn] Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts (#1480) (Wednesday, 9 September)
Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) (Wednesday, 9 September)
Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) (Wednesday, 9 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Thursday, 3 September)
[webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) (Thursday, 3 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] add additional attestation format(s) from Apple (#1453) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) (Tuesday, 1 September)

Adam Langley

[w3c/webauthn] cfc0e9: Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (Wednesday, 30 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 6156ba: Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) (Wednesday, 16 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 7107ed: Virtual authenticators extension support (Wednesday, 9 September)

Adam Langley via GitHub

[webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Wednesday, 30 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [webauthn] Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (#1470) (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) (Sunday, 27 September)
Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) (Friday, 25 September)
Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) (Monday, 14 September)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Add note about fixed/empty user handles (Monday, 14 September)
Re: [webauthn] Make largeBlobs explicit during create. (#1470) (Monday, 14 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Virtual authenticators extension support (Wednesday, 9 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Wednesday, 9 September)
Closed: [webauthn] Virtual authenticator support for extensions (#1471) (Wednesday, 9 September)

Akshay Kumar via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Minor cleanups from PR 1270 review (#1291) (Wednesday, 30 September)

Arian van Putten via GitHub

Closed: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) (Monday, 28 September)
Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) (Monday, 28 September)
Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) (Monday, 28 September)
Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) (Monday, 28 September)
[webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) (Monday, 28 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Friday, 11 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Friday, 11 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Friday, 11 September)
Re: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Friday, 11 September)

CrazyChris75 via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) (Saturday, 26 September)
Re: [webauthn] Provide the public key in `AuthenticatorAttestationResponse` (#1363) (Monday, 21 September)

Emil Lundberg

[w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 10 September)
[w3c/webauthn] a08ad9: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAut... (Thursday, 10 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 84cf69: Make unprotected account detection scenario more r... (Thursday, 10 September)
[w3c/webauthn] a08ad9: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAut... (Monday, 7 September)
[w3c/webauthn] ef56e0: Add script that uses Docker image to update Bikesh... (Thursday, 3 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 3ae650: Add script that uses Docker image to update Bikesh... (Thursday, 3 September)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Thursday, 17 September)
Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 10 September)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts (Thursday, 10 September)
Closed: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) (Thursday, 10 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 10 September)
Re: [webauthn] undefined terms and terms we really ought to define (#462) (Monday, 7 September)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Add security consideration on detecting non-WebAuthn accounts (Monday, 7 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 7 September)
Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) (Friday, 4 September)
Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) (Thursday, 3 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 3 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 3 September)
Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) (Tuesday, 1 September)

J.C. Jones

[w3c/webauthn] 9e634a: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension (#1481) (Wednesday, 16 September)

J.C. Jones via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Remove the Psuedo-Random Function extension (Wednesday, 9 September)
[webauthn] Remove Out-Of-Scope PRF Extension (#1478) (Thursday, 3 September)
Re: [webauthn] Virtual authenticators extension support (#1472) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Jeff Hodges

Fwd: Fall 2020 TPAC event - Registration now open (Thursday, 10 September)
TPAC 2020 schedule... (Thursday, 3 September)
Web Payment Security Interest Group (WPSIG) meeting 6,7-Oct -- WebAuthn WG update? (Thursday, 3 September)

Jiewen Tan via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] Abstracting the concept of Privacy CA/Attestation CA into Anonymization CA (#1474) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) (Tuesday, 1 September)
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) (Tuesday, 1 September)
Re: [webauthn] more fully delineate "privacy ca", "attestation ca", "anonymization ca" (#1422) (Tuesday, 1 September)

John Bradley via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Is it possible to fail the registration ceremony if a certain extension is not present? (#1487) (Monday, 28 September)
Closed: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462) (Friday, 4 September)

Julien Cayzac

[w3c/webauthn] eef23b: Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissi... (Wednesday, 16 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 383971: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache (#1479) (Wednesday, 9 September)

Julien Cayzac via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] changing to "permissions policy" messed up MDN links (#1486) (Thursday, 17 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Thursday, 10 September)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Update .spec-data .bikeshed-include cache (Monday, 7 September)
Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) (Monday, 7 September)
Re: [webauthn] need "how to install bikeshed in one's local webauthn repo clone" instructions (#1477) (Monday, 7 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Monday, 7 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Thursday, 3 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Thursday, 3 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Thursday, 3 September)
Re: [webauthn] Update "feature policy" refs to new name "permissions policy" (#1473) (#1476) (Thursday, 3 September)

Jun Hayakawa via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) (Wednesday, 16 September)

Keiko Itakura via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) (Monday, 28 September)
[webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure, from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) (Friday, 4 September)

Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258) (Tuesday, 29 September)
Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Thursday, 17 September)

Lucas Garron via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: [webauthn] Add note about fixed/empty user handles (#1483) (Monday, 14 September)

Max Hata via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Regarding the issue of Credential ID exposure(13.5.6), from what perspective should RP compare RK and NRK and which should be adopted? (#1484) (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) (Wednesday, 2 September)
Re: [webauthn] The risk of attacker may can identify whether if the account support FIDO or not (#1475) (Wednesday, 2 September)

nadalin@prodigy.net

09/30/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 29 September)
09/23/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 23 September)
09/16/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 15 September)
09/09/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 8 September)
09/02/2020 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 1 September)

Nick Steele via GitHub

Closed: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Thursday, 24 September)

Nina Satragno via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Virtual authenticators extension support (#1472) (Wednesday, 2 September)

Shane B Weeden

RE: [webauthn] New platform authenticators are making discoverable credentials regardless of residentKey=false passed to Create() (#1457) (Friday, 11 September)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] export definitions? (#1049) (Wednesday, 30 September)

Thomas via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Clearly define the way how RP handles the extensions (#1258) (Thursday, 24 September)
Re: [webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Thursday, 17 September)
[webauthn] Handling unwanted or unsupported attestation formats (#1485) (Wednesday, 16 September)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 29 September)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 22 September)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 15 September)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 8 September)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 1 September)

WebAuthnBot

[w3c/webauthn] 550853: Built by Travis-CI: 7839cd073aae5496176c0060c75f4d... (Wednesday, 30 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 4a1a06: Built by Travis-CI: 6156ba8e00b5a2ff8867008a1e0cd0... (Wednesday, 16 September)
[w3c/webauthn] ba8b0e: Built by Travis-CI: 9e634a8a4e3b30a768cda642452c86... (Wednesday, 16 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 61aaf4: Built by Travis-CI: eef23b1406d45ae95a2984311cd5e2... (Wednesday, 16 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 2fa8f9: Built by Travis-CI: 570648fa66d4a5451bee011bf3f9b4... (Thursday, 10 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 531de2: Built by Travis-CI: 383971fa7f3ef35936b11fe8dfebbc... (Wednesday, 9 September)
[w3c/webauthn] 47c935: Built by Travis-CI: ff9c5b03d2397ed10b7a285e068d08... (Wednesday, 9 September)
[w3c/webauthn] d2ce3d: Built by Travis-CI: ff9c5b03d2397ed10b7a285e068d08... (Wednesday, 9 September)

WebAuthnBot via GitHub

[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 30 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 16 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Thursday, 10 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 9 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 9 September)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 9 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 22:50:02 UTC