public-webauthn@w3.org from December 2018 by date

Friday, 21 December 2018

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Singularize a "Relying Parties'" to "Relying Party's" Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b78f82: Singularize Relying Parties' to Relying Party's GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Thursday, 20 December 2018

• Re: web-platform-tests results Emil Lundberg
• Re: web-platform-tests results Adam Langley

Wednesday, 19 December 2018

• Re: [webauthn] spec is missing baseline posture that credential source is bound to a particular authenticator (#1122) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: web-platform-tests results Adam Langley
• Re: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] In safetynet attestation "nonce" is base64, not base64url (#1093) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] In safetynet attestation "nonce" is base64, not base64url (#1093) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
• Re: web-platform-tests results Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: [webauthn] spec is missing baseline posture that credential source is bound to a particular authenticator (#1122) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• 12/19/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda Anthony Nadalin

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

• [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Benjamin VanderSloot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Lack of support for modern ECC (#1124) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] fe2154: Built by Travis-CI: f332dfe3dc31c9c336789812a8715c... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 745bb1: Built by Travis-CI: f332dfe3dc31c9c336789812a8715c... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 142cb0: Match text for identical verification steps GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Match text for identical verification steps Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify relationships between "uv"/"up" of the CTAP spec and "userVerification"/"userPresence" (#1123) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify relationships between "uv"/"up" of the CTAP spec and "userVerification"/"userPresence" (#1123) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify relationships between "uv"/"up" of the CTAP spec and "userVerification"/"userPresence" (#1123) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Lack of support for modern ECC (#1124) Michał Staruch via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarify relationships between "uv"/"up" of the CTAP spec and "userVerification"/"userPresence" (#1123) Jiewen Tan via GitHub

Monday, 17 December 2018

• Re: web-platform-tests results Philippe Le Hégaret

Saturday, 15 December 2018

• [webauthn] spec is missing baseline posture that credential source is bound to a particular authenticator (#1122) =JeffH via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 97fc82: Built by Travis-CI: 2b826ef655faac81f24e92f93f78f6... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f6959a: Built by Travis-CI: 2b826ef655faac81f24e92f93f78f6... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 24cd9d: Fix typos in get() algorithm GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix typos in get() algorithm Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Typo clientExtensions should be authenticatorExtensions (#1089) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Friday, 14 December 2018

• Re: [webauthn] Match text for identical verification steps (#1119) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Match text for identical verification steps (#1119) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Fix typos in get() algorithm (#1092) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Thursday, 13 December 2018

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add the Entity Attestation Token gmandyam via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Q: Authenticators displaying data? (#1116) yanosz via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Wednesday, 12 December 2018

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix typo in credential registration steps Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Match text for identical verification steps (#1119) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: Cancel today's W3C Web Authn meeting Emil Lundberg
• Cancel today's W3C Web Authn meeting John Fontana
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Match text for identical verification steps Nick Steele via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Note that appid should be set to the previously used AppID Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 486eb7: Note that appid should be set to the previously us... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Clarify what value goes into appid extension input (#1117) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Monday, 10 December 2018

• Closed: [webauthn] Q: Authenticators displaying data? (#1116) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Q: Authenticators displaying data? (#1116) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Sunday, 9 December 2018

• Re: [webauthn] Q: Authenticators displaying data? (#1116) Rolf Lindemann
• [webauthn] Q: Authenticators displaying data? (#1116) yanosz via GitHub
• 12/12/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda - CANCELLED Anthony Nadalin

Saturday, 8 December 2018

• Re: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub

Friday, 7 December 2018

• Re: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: web-platform-tests results Anthony Nadalin

Thursday, 6 December 2018

• Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions Adam Langley
• RE: Qualcomm position- Extensions Giridhar Mandyam
• Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions Christiaan Brand
• Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions Adam Langley
• RE: Qualcomm position- Extensions Giridhar Mandyam
• Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions Adam Langley
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions J.C. Jones
• Re: [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
• Re: web-platform-tests results Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: web-platform-tests results Anthony Nadalin
• [webauthn] Should clients enforce challenge length? (#1115) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub

Wednesday, 5 December 2018

• web-platform-tests results Philippe Le Hégaret
• RE: Qualcomm position- Extensions Giridhar Mandyam
• Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions Arshad Noor
• Qualcomm position- Extensions Giridhar Mandyam
• 12/05/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions John Bradley
• RE: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions RAE HAYWARD

Tuesday, 4 December 2018

• RE: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Mike Jones
• RE: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Anthony Nadalin
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Samuel Weiler
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Akshay Kumar
• RE: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Giridhar Mandyam
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Christiaan Brand
• AW: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions rlindemann@noknok.com
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Christiaan Brand
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions J.C. Jones
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Christiaan Brand

Monday, 3 December 2018

• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Adam Langley
• Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Ken Ebert
• IMPORTANT READ - Extensions Anthony Nadalin

Last message date: Friday, 21 December 2018 14:52:17 UTC