Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 8:18 AM Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>
wrote:

> Qualcomm does not recommend changing the current position of the group.  I
> realize the request below only sought a response if a member company wanted
> to change the position of the group, but I felt it was important to
> re-iterate Qualcomm’s position.
>
>
>
> This is consistent with the presentation I made to the W3C Directorate in
> October – see enclosed.  The recommendations are summarized on slide 10 and
> reproduced here:
>
>
>
>    - Continue to keep normative guidance in spec that all extensions are
>    optional
>    - Follow Sam’s suggestion to specify AAID extension as RECOMMENDED
>    {“Sam” = Sam Weiler}
>    - Keep all extension text as normative
>
> Note: I believe that only the appid extension would be normative in any
case, because that's the only extension with sufficient implementation.

>