W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > December 2018

Re: Qualcomm position- Extensions

From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:01:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLyj20Dr_b64gxo+uScD_zakDpZXNfdZXj6Wab1BXZsBug@mail.gmail.com>
To: mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com
Cc: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:55 AM Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>

> Got it.
> > I could have misunderstood, but I think the issue there was that the W3C
> wants to see interoperability for normative parts of the spec.
> As per the background research described in the deck I sent out, this is a
> requirement for standards-track documents.  But W3C process allows for a WG
> to request a waiver from the Directorate (normally TBL, currently Ralph),
> which is also part of my recommendation.

I could certainly be wrong about whether the other extensions have a shot
at being normative. While it doesn't change Google's position, it certainly
seems that enough people want to try waiting a little longer.


Received on Thursday, 6 December 2018 19:01:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:58:59 UTC