W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > December 2018

Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions

From: Ken Ebert <ken@sovrin.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:24:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+TjgodJszfpuywqqqieX1ROFyJ57zVdYW1MK4mSAxFmKKbhrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tonynad@microsoft.com
Cc: public-webauthn@w3.org
As a newcomer to the WG, I am not clear regarding potential negative
consequences of the 2-3 weeks to resolve concerns with the W3C to make the
extensions optional and normative. This is likely to be obvious to everyone
else, but I could benefit from some enlightenment.

Thanks,
Ken Ebert

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:06 AM Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> The current consensus position within the working group was to continue to
> push to keep the “extensions” as optional and normative, due to delays on
> meeting the ongoing requirements of the W3C for extensions an option was
> proposed at the last WG call to mark the extensions as optional and
> non-normative, but still publish the extensions as part of the
> specification. I would estimate that we would be 2-3 weeks more of
> discussions with the W3C staff to complete the answers they are looking for
> if we wanted to continue to make the extensions as optional and normative.
>
>
>
> If WG member would like to change the current position from as optional
> and normative to optional and non-normative please respond to this message,
> or if you have other suggestions please also respond.
>
Received on Monday, 3 December 2018 16:25:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:58:59 UTC