Re: IMPORTANT READ - Extensions

As a newcomer to the WG, I am not clear regarding potential negative
consequences of the 2-3 weeks to resolve concerns with the W3C to make the
extensions optional and normative. This is likely to be obvious to everyone
else, but I could benefit from some enlightenment.

Thanks,
Ken Ebert

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:06 AM Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> The current consensus position within the working group was to continue to
> push to keep the “extensions” as optional and normative, due to delays on
> meeting the ongoing requirements of the W3C for extensions an option was
> proposed at the last WG call to mark the extensions as optional and
> non-normative, but still publish the extensions as part of the
> specification. I would estimate that we would be 2-3 weeks more of
> discussions with the W3C staff to complete the answers they are looking for
> if we wanted to continue to make the extensions as optional and normative.
>
>
>
> If WG member would like to change the current position from as optional
> and normative to optional and non-normative please respond to this message,
> or if you have other suggestions please also respond.
>