public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2014 by author

Alex Russell

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Wednesday, 10 December)

Andrew Betts

• [ServiceWorker] Inclusion of `referer` in preflight `Access-Control-Request-Headers` despite not being set (#596) (Wednesday, 31 December)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename the Client interface (#350) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Where to put client / context (#318) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Where to put client / context (#318) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [push-api] Push registration should require active Service Worker (#92) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [push-api] Push registration should require active Service Worker (#92) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] What does invoke mean? (#15) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] What does invoke mean? (#15) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] ASCII whitespace is no longer defined (#11) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] ASCII whitespace is no longer defined (#11) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] Basic URL parser doesn't return anything (#10) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] What is authoring requirements even about? (#2) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Arthur Barstow

• [editing-explainer] Add links to some TF resources. (#35) (Saturday, 20 December)
• [webcomponents] Change pub date to 16-Dec-2014 (#28) (Thursday, 11 December)
• [editing-explainer] Add link to charter. (#23) (Tuesday, 9 December)

B

• [screen-orientation] The orientation type 'Natural' should only lock to x-primary (#83) (Thursday, 4 December)

bashi

• [push-api] Make PushEventInit inherit from ExtendableEventInit (#90) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [push-api] Use ExtendableEventInit instead of EventInit (#78) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Ben Francis

• [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] Link space / "deep linking" (#288) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Friday, 12 December)

Ben Kelly

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Ben Peters

• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Add links to some TF resources. (#35) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Monday, 15 December)
• [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.empty() as an alias of removeAllRanges() (#36) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Need to be able to tell if the caret is displayed at the beginning or the end of the line (#32) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Need a way to get combining character status from Range or offset (#31) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] How do we feature detect Responsive Input Events? (#32) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Need to spec the data in beforeInput event (#29) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] Need to spec the data in beforeInput event (#29) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] Should beforeFocus be another Responsive Input Event? (#27) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] Should Device-Specific Input Events say what Responsive Input Event they will cause? (#25) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [editing-explainer] What should be the target element for Responsive Input Events? (#24) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Add link to charter. (#23) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [selection-api] Specify where the caret should be placed in the markup (#28) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21) (Monday, 8 December)
• [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 8 December)
• [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their intention? (#18) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should we include the default result in the Intention Event? (#10) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should we include the default result in the Intention Event? (#10) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• [selection-api] Should we include the default result in the beforeSelectionChange Event? (#26) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Remove "Specification" from the title (#15) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the shape of contentEditable? (#4) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Consistent Shape for Intention Events (#12) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Consistent Shape for Intention Events (#12) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Does ClipboardEvents need to match the shape of other Intention Events (#8) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] BeforeInput or CommandEvent? (#9) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Add a section for "new low-level APIs" to Editing Explainer (#3) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand or something new to fire IntentionEvents? (#5) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the shape of contentEditable? (#4) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33) (Friday, 5 December)

Brad Hill

• [url] Add method to return delegation boundary of a URL (#39) (Tuesday, 30 December)

Claes Nilsson

• Re: [permissions] Redundant assertion (#2) (Tuesday, 2 December)

Denis Sokolov

• [ServiceWorker] Typo in explainer, code example, catch portion (#577) (Sunday, 7 December)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] acknowledgement for semantics content (#30) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] Change pub date to 16-Dec-2014 (#28) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] fixed code examples (#27) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [streams] Add popover on branch and commit snapshots (#221) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249) (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241) (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [streams] typo (#257) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [streams] typo (#257) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [streams] Allow object with methods to be passed as (writeable) sink (#256) (Friday, 19 December)
• [webidl] Stringifier says it requires DOMString, but should also allow USVString (#35) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Friday, 12 December)
• [streams] Reorganize examples (#255) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Friday, 12 December)
• [streams] Document globals created by this spec (#254) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [streams] How will ReadableByteStream work with seekable resources? (#253) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [streams] Garbage collection (#252) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] What does invoke mean? (#15) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [url] What is "result"? (#5) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535) (Friday, 5 December)
• [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [url] What is "result"? (#5) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only? (#245) (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)

Frederico Caldeira Knabben

• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Tuesday, 16 December)

Gavin Peters

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetching resources using SW (#570) (Monday, 1 December)

HE Shi-Jun

• [streams] typo (#257) (Monday, 22 December)

Hiroki Nakagawa

• [ServiceWorker] Define promise type of ServiceWorkerClient::focus() (#571) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595) (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Grammatical fix (#591) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Grammatical fix (#591) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Friday, 12 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 12 December)
• [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] A programmatic and reliable way to unregister all ports (even it's used from others tabs) (#579) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controlling? (#583) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controlling? (#583) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controlling? (#583) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope? (#582) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope? (#582) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535) (Thursday, 4 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can Cache.add() committing at response resolution lead to duplicate requests? (#361) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should skipWaiting() wait for an "in-progress request" to finish? (#569) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Jan Krems

• [streams] Allow object with methods to be passed as (writeable) sink (#256) (Friday, 19 December)

Johannes Hund

• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) (Sunday, 28 December)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Saturday, 6 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Thursday, 4 December)

John Mellor

• Re: [push-api] Mention what to do in register() and getRegistration() if there is no active SW (#100) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89) (Monday, 1 December)

John Reilly

• Re: [ServiceWorker] service-worker.d.ts.... (#576) (Friday, 5 December)
• [ServiceWorker] service-worker.d.ts.... (#576) (Friday, 5 December)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)

Josh Karlin

• Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574) (Monday, 8 December)

Joshua Bell

• [ServiceWorker] IDL nit: missing semicolon (#593) (Tuesday, 16 December)

Joshua Peek

• [streams] Garbage collection (#252) (Wednesday, 10 December)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [ServiceWorker] "The double square bracket notation ([[name of method or name of property]]) is used throughout the specification to indicate user agent's internal data structures." (#529) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] "The double square bracket notation ([[name of method or name of property]]) is used throughout the specification to indicate user agent's internal data structures." (#529) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595) (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595) (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL nit: missing semicolon (#593) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL nit: missing semicolon (#593) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Typo in explainer, code example, catch portion (#577) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Define promise type of ServiceWorkerClient::focus() (#571) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Define promise type of ServiceWorkerClient::focus() (#571) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] What happens if there's an appcache manifest? (#275) (Tuesday, 2 December)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [manifest] expanded navigation scope text (e3b2821) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (dc34c95) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (e5c4dcd) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (e5c4dcd) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] When created, navigate to start url (b9fde73) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)

Koji Ishii

• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Need a way to get combining character status from Range or offset (#31) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Monday, 22 December)

Kunihiko Sakamoto

• [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572) (Thursday, 4 December)

Larry Masinter

• [url] make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF (#38) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] be explicit about change control issue (#37) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] point to W3C bugzilla as evidence of past WHATWG/W3C work (#36) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] list more radical rewrite as a possible outcome (#35) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] clarify "scheme specific definitions" problem (#34) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] note kinds of interop issues (#33) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] clarify "parameterization" problem (#32) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] are naming in APIs a problem IETF should solve (#31) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] IETF examples of using "URL" rather than "URI" (#30) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] be clearer about problem-statement draft purpose, and plan of work (#29) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] note possibility of implementation-dependent file: (#28) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] any update to 3986 must meet requirements for updating IETF Standard (#27) (Sunday, 28 December)
• [url] Address more comments (#26) (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [url] remaining comments from Larry (#23) (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [url] remaining comments from Larry (#23) (Friday, 26 December)
• [url] test URL-encoding of forms in HTML (#25) (Friday, 26 December)
• [url] address comments (#24) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• [url] remaining comments from Larry (#23) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• [url] RFC 3987 topics not included in the URL standard (#18) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• [url] Update url-problem-statement.xml (#17) (Wednesday, 17 December)

laurentperez

• Re: [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292) (Saturday, 20 December)
• [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292) (Friday, 19 December)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#297) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [manifest] expanded navigation scope text (#296) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#297) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• [manifest] expanded navigation scope text (#296) (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22) (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22) (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22) (Thursday, 25 December)
• [url] Added inScope static (#22) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [manifest] Cleaned up markup and cross refs (#295) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [manifest] Cleaned up markup and cross refs (#295) (Monday, 22 December)
• [manifest] Cleaned up markup and cross refs (#295) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294) (Sunday, 21 December)
• Re: [manifest] Link space / "deep linking" (#288) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] added text about installable web apps (#290) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] Clarify that start URL is not always `start_url`'s value (#293) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] Need to define how to apply the manifest (#226) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (e5c4dcd) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] When created, navigate to start url (b9fde73) (Saturday, 20 December)
• [manifest] Clarify that start URL is not always `start_url`'s value (#293) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] When created, navigate to start url (b9fde73) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289) (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Friday, 19 December)
• [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] Cookies and data collection policies (#281) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] Cookies and data collection policies (#281) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest icon's 'type' should be a valid IMAGE mime type, not a valid mime type (#287) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest icon's 'type' should be a valid IMAGE mime type, not a valid mime type (#287) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Thursday, 18 December)
• [manifest] added text about installable web apps (#290) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [manifest] Need to define how to apply the manifest (#226) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL for updating badge/tag (e.g. number of messages waiting) (#268) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL for updating badge/tag (e.g. number of messages waiting) (#268) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [manifest] Icon density parsing should have a developer warning (#282) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [manifest] Icon density parsing should have a developer warning (#282) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• [webidl] Transferables (#34) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [manifest] Link space (#288) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89) (Monday, 1 December)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595) (Friday, 26 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595) (Friday, 26 December)
• [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] "The user agent may terminate service workers at any time it has no event to handle." (#527) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetching resources using SW (#570) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Prefetching resources using SW (#570) (Monday, 1 December)

Matthew Gaunt

• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587) (Wednesday, 10 December)

Michael van Ouwerkerk

• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Rename PushRegistrationManager to PushManager. (#99) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] Rename PushRegistrationManager to PushManager. (#99) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94) (Friday, 12 December)
• [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [push-api] Push registration should require active Service Worker (#92) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [push-api] removed wrong curly bracket in example (#91) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [push-api] removed wrong curly bracket in example (#91) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [push-api] Make PushEventInit inherit from ExtendableEventInit (#90) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [push-api] Use ExtendableEventInit instead of EventInit (#78) (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [push-api] Make PushEventInit inherit from ExtendableEventInit (#90) (Wednesday, 3 December)

michael-nordman

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423) (Wednesday, 3 December)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: [url] make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF (#38) (Monday, 29 December)

miguelgarciaarribas

• Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89) (Monday, 1 December)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588) (Friday, 19 December)
• [push-api] Mention what to do in register() and getRegistration() if there is no active SW (#100) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94) (Wednesday, 10 December)

Norbert Lindenberg

• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Friday, 12 December)

Olivier

• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Wednesday, 31 December)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 30 December)

Olivier Forget

• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• [editing-explainer] behavior of text nodes inside cE=typing (#22) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 7 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Saturday, 6 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Friday, 5 December)

Paul Em

• Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95) (Monday, 15 December)
• [push-api] removed wrong curly bracket in example (#91) (Friday, 5 December)

paulchef

• [selection-api] support selection.containsNode(obj, true) (#39) (Friday, 26 December)

Peter Beverloo

• Re: [push-api] Rename PushRegistrationManager to PushManager. (#99) (Monday, 15 December)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• [selection-api] Specify Selection.setPosition()? (#38) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Specify Selection.empty() as an alias of removeAllRanges() (#36) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Add Selection.type to the spec (#14) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.type? (#35) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.type? (#35) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Specify Selection.type? (#35) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Specify baseNode/baseOffset/extentNode/extentOffset? (#34) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] unsigned long is never negative (#33) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [selection-api] Add a "Selection interface" section (#29) (Wednesday, 10 December)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• [url] Editors' listing and status (#5) (Thursday, 4 December)

reschke

• [url] mention RFC 4395, typos, lc/uc, add comments (#21) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [url] fix ID references, fix WG element, fix AREA element, remove unneeded emp... (#19) (Thursday, 18 December)
• [url] fix ID references, fix WG element, fix AREA element, remove unneeded emp... (#19) (Thursday, 18 December)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Fixed typo. (#24) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27) (Monday, 8 December)

Sam Ruby

• Re: [url] make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF (#38) (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [url] Address more comments (#26) (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [url] Address more comments (#26) (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22) (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22) (Thursday, 25 December)
• Re: [url] address comments (#24) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [url] mention RFC 4395, typos, lc/uc, add comments (#21) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [url] fix ID references, fix WG element, fix AREA element, remove unneeded emp... (#19) (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [url] RFC 3987 topics not included in the URL standard (#18) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [url] Update url-problem-statement.xml (#17) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [url] Basic URL parser doesn't return anything (#10) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] ASCII whitespace is no longer defined (#11) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [url] Editors' listing and status (#5) (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: [url] What is "result"? (#5) (Thursday, 4 December)

Sandro Paganotti

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Tuesday, 9 December)

ShijunS

• Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89) (Monday, 1 December)

stevefaulkner

• [webcomponents] change acc name advice (#31) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] acknowledgement for semantics content (#30) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Monday, 15 December)
• [webcomponents] acknowledgement for semantics content (#30) (Monday, 15 December)
• [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29) (Sunday, 14 December)
• [webcomponents] fixed code examples (#27) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)
• [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26) (Monday, 8 December)

Takeshi Yoshino

• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Security consideration about the `cache` parameter of `Request` (#585) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248) (Monday, 1 December)

Tomás Aparicio

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope? (#582) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controller? (#583) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] A way to coordinate the refresh of all controlled windows to facilitate an upgrade (#422) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope (#582) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580) (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580) (Monday, 8 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580) (Monday, 8 December)
• [ServiceWorker] A programmatic and reliable way to unregister all ports (even it's used from others tabs) (#579) (Monday, 8 December)
• [ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578) (Sunday, 7 December)

Tsuyoshi Horo

• [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 16 December)

Wenbo Zhu

• Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249) (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249) (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249) (Thursday, 4 December)

Xabier Rodríguez

• Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250) (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250) (Monday, 8 December)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251) (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241) (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452) (Tuesday, 2 December)

Zack Gold

• [ServiceWorker] Grammatical fix (#591) (Tuesday, 16 December)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 December 2014 19:29:35 UTC