- From: Jonas Sicking <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:16:08 -0800
- To: w3c/push-api <push-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 19:16:34 UTC
It would probably be preferable to have a more explicit signal in the API for "This UA supports a standardized registration-free application-server-to-push-server protocol" rather than an empty `PushManager.proprietaryService` list. If for no other reason than that a UA might want to support proprietary services in addition to the standard one in order to support existing clients. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/95#issuecomment-67048229
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 19:16:34 UTC