[url] note possibility of implementation-dependent file: (#28)

> > ( "file:" might need a special case pre-processor for
> > the web, with the result translated/normalized.)
> 
> File may end up being implementation defined.  Perhaps that should be
> listed as a possible outcome.  See:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27518
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/KyxFLw2FCwv7CSpiWAmLr8Ha7vc

There might be a lot of ways of slicing the domains of
interoperability, and perhaps something else other than "implementation"
(platform x file-system-type) might serve the community better.


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/webspecs/url/issues/28