- From: B <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 21:50:54 -0800
- To: w3c/screen-orientation <screen-orientation@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 05:51:23 UTC
The following definition has contradictions, leading to confusion as to what is 'natural': > natural: Append portrait-primary, portrait-secondary, landscape-primary or landscape-secondary to orientations such as the associated screen orientation angle is 0. The angle shall never be `0` on a -secondary position. The point of `natural` is to be a unique `0` angle with a `180` reverse angle. Allowing an implementation to lock to `x-secondary` with `natural` would reduce natural to an orientation as opposed an angle, which is the initial point of `natural` isn't it? It should definitely not be the same as `any`. The platform convention is most likely to do natural with an 'any' lock here anyway. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues/83
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 05:51:23 UTC