Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)

> Cool! Would I be pushing my luck to suggest a that you follow this advice :smirk: ?

Not at all, I can have a go at it.

> I'm concerned about implicitly encouraging people to violate this advice.

Good point. Besides, saying it takes a string (rather than an object or string) will just coerce a URL object into a string, which is fine. Gives the same results :+1: 

> Finally, I want to capture that you have made a concrete proposal for method names. 

Sounds like a plan. 


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/webspecs/url/issues/20#issuecomment-67792774