- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:28:09 -0800
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 19:28:47 UTC
> Is there a scenario when getAll() is useful without filtering by type? Your examples seem like they would benefit from a filter on window. There's already `.getAll({ includeUncontrolled: true })`, adding a `type` option that defaults to `window` seems pretty sensible, with other values being `worker`, `shared-worker` or `all`. (includeUncontrolled, ugh, maybe includeUnclaimed if we're going for `clients.claim()`) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/588#issuecomment-67050122
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 19:28:47 UTC