7.2.3.1 Wide Review changes
Advisory Board Will Review of the Current Editor's Draft of Process2015 on February 12, 2015
Agenda Process Document Task Force 13 January 2015a
Agenda Process Document Task Force 20 January 2015a
Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015
Agenda Process Document Task Force 6 January 2015a
call is at 1500Z (not 1400) EoM Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 13 January 2015a
Data on WG participation / activity / progress
Errata - a proposal
errata again, responding to the november proposal
- David Singer (Wednesday, 21 January)
- chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Wayne Carr (Tuesday, 20 January)
- David Singer (Tuesday, 20 January)
- David Singer (Tuesday, 20 January)
- David Singer (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Stephen Zilles (Monday, 19 January)
- Wayne Carr (Monday, 19 January)
- Stephen Zilles (Monday, 19 January)
- David Singer (Friday, 16 January)
- Jeff Jaffe (Thursday, 15 January)
- chaals@yandex-team.ru (Thursday, 15 January)
- David Singer (Thursday, 15 January)
- David Singer (Thursday, 15 January)
- David Singer (Thursday, 15 January)
- Jeff Jaffe (Thursday, 15 January)
- Olle Olsson (Thursday, 15 January)
- Jeff Jaffe (Thursday, 15 January)
- David Singer (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Jeff Jaffe (Tuesday, 13 January)
- chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 13 January)
Is ISSUE-128 relevant?
Limiting Charter extensions
Minutes of the Process Document TF
New draft
New draft…
New editor's draft
On updating a Submission
PERs re discussion of ISSUE-152
public info
Section 2.2 Team Description
Summary of Resolutions re Process 2015
w3process-ACTION-46: Consider proposing minimal changes to the nov errata revision to address concerns
w3process-ISSUE-151 (Resigning from a WG): How to resign from a working group [Process Document]
w3process-ISSUE-152 (Regress Editorial Change): Process2014 Regresses Editorial Revision of RECs [Process Document]
w3process-ISSUE-153 (Draft CG Text for Guide): Draft a new section of the Chair;s Guide to cover Coordiantion among Groups
w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document]
What are the specific Issues re (re-)chartering? [Was: Re: Limiting Charter extensions]
Last message date: Friday, 30 January 2015 19:45:06 UTC