- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:47:18 -0800
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru
- Cc: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 00:48:48 UTC
Hi chaals, That'd work for me! Thanks. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM Software Group From: chaals@yandex-team.ru To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org> Date: 01/22/2015 04:27 PM Subject: Re: On updating a Submission 23.01.2015, 00:57, "Arnaud Le Hors" <lehors@us.ibm.com>: Hi, Having just spent too much time on trying to find out what it takes to update a Submission I'd like to suggest that the following sentence found at the end of section 11.3 Acknowledgment of a Submission Request be moved to its own section titled something like Updating or Revising a Submission so it can be found more easily: If the Submitter(s) wishes to modify a document published as the result of acknowledgment, the Submitter(s) MUST start the Submission process from the beginning, even just to correct editorial changes. http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#SubmissionYes Hi Arnaud, that seems like a simple editorial change. I propose to make a section "11.5 Revising a published Submission". cheers chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 00:48:48 UTC