Re: 7.2.3.1 Wide Review changes

LGTM

> On Jan 19, 2015, at 18:21 , Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> The current Editors draft of Process2015 does not include the changes to the first paragraph of this section listed in the Resolutions of the Process TF [1], Issues 144 and 148. The current draft has:
>  
> “The requirements for wide review are not precisely defined by the W3C Process. The objective is to ensure that the entire set of stakeholders of the Web community, including the general public, have had adequate notice of the progress of the Working Group and thereby an opportunity to comment on the specification. Before approving transitions, the Director will consider who has been explicitly offered a reasonable opportunity to review the document, who has provided comments, the record of requests to and responses from reviewers, especially groups identified as dependencies in the charter, and seek evidence of clear communication to the general public about appropriate times and which content to review.”
>  
> The text per the Resolved Issues should be:
>  
> 
> “The requirements for wide review are not precisely defined by the W3C Process. The objective is to ensure that the entire set of stakeholders of the Web community, including the general public, have had adequate notice of the progress of the Working Group (for example, using public-review-announce@w3.org <mailto:public-review-announce@w3.org>) and were able to actually perform reviews of and provide comments on the specification. A second objective is to encourage groups to request reviews early enough that comments and suggested changes may still be reasonably incorporated in response to the review. Before approving transitions, the Director will consider who has been explicitly offered a reasonable opportunity to review the document, who has provided comments, the record of requests to and responses from reviewers, especially groups identified as dependencies in the charter or identified as <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison.html">liaisons</a>, and seek evidence of clear communication to the general public about appropriate times and which content to review and whether such reviews actually occurred.”
>  
> Steve Z

Dave Singer

singer@mac.com

Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 15:11:33 UTC