Re: public info

On 1/9/2015 3:08 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 9, 2015, at 2:00 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday 2015-01-09 11:49 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
>>> On Friday 2015-01-09 14:31 -0500, Brian Kardell wrote:
>>>> I'm sure that there would be hesitance (I think it's been officially said
>>>> no) to disclose anything about the voting experiements, but is there -any-
>>>> kind of info?  Like, what % of people who voted voted in experiments?  I'm
>>>> not sure how it was arranged - was it possible that someone voted in
>>>> experiments without voting in the real thing?  Is it possible to say
>>>> something that doesn't give it away or undermine but still says something
>>>> useful - like, the numeric order of "most votes to least votes" differed
>>>> from the same kind of preferential sort?
>>>
>>> One thing about the voting experiments that I just noticed:  the
>>> response email from WBS for the ranked-choice voting doesn't match
>>> what I actually filled out; it shows "Don't want" next to the
>>> candidate I ranked as #1, 1 next to the candidate I ranked as #2, 2
>>> next to the candidate I ranked as #3, etc., down to 6 next to the
>>> candidate I ranked as #7.  (I think; assuming I'm remembering what I
>>> did correctly.)
>>
>> To clarify here:  I see the correct ballot online when I view it in
>> WBS; it's only the email response that I got (which also went to an
>> archived team-only list, I believe) that is wrong.
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> Thanks for that heads-up. I agree; the email looks wrong. I will look into that.

The content of the email reply was raised and noted as a bug a couple of
days ago.  Our sysfolk assure us that the captured data is correct and
only the generated email is inaccurate.

> 
> Ian
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 20:57:29 UTC