W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > January 2015

PERs re discussion of ISSUE-152

From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:29:42 +0300
To: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <michael.champion@microsoft.com>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-Id: <46161422397782@webcorp02g.yandex-team.ru>
+ public-w3process@
- all

27.01.2015, 18:01, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>:
...
> Thanks to Ian's suggestion, the W3C webmasters have pointed us to the following URLs containing data on all spec draft publications since 1995.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/new-tr.rdf has everything since September 2011
> The rdf files below contain data for publications between Nov 17, 1995
> to Sept 21, 2011.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-19951117-20020326.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20020327-20030519.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20030520-20040114.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20040114-20040601.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20040602-20050103.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20050104-20050729.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20050730-20060303.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20060304-20060822.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20060823-20070518.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20070519-20071231.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20080101-20090327.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-pub-20090328-20110921.rdf

With a very simple grep, it appears that W3C has published 340 Recommendations, and 69 Proposed Edited Recs. Checking against the TR page It appears that something less than 1/4 of specifications are revised. We also know that some are revised more than once.

A large proportion of Recs on RDF (including RDFa, RDF, OWL, etc), XML (including Xquery, Schema, etc), and XHTML, have revised editions. XML itself, a couple of RDFa specs and Xforms have multiple revisions. SVG 1.1, PNG, TTML, MathML, are some of the groups who have apparently revised one spec.

Cheers

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:30:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 27 January 2015 22:30:15 UTC